head to head · open source

lottie-ios vs openharness

lottie-ios has 26,882 GitHub stars, 3,840 forks, 44 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. openharness has 529 stars, 50 forks, 40 open issues and last shipped yesterday. lottie-ios leads on adoption by 4,982% (26,882 vs 529 stars). lottie-ios is written in Swift under Apache-2.0; openharness is written in C under MIT. lottie-ios has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, openharness 9%. openharness was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

lottie-ios ★ 27K openharness ★ 529 category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

lottie-ios openharness
GitHub stars ★ 27K ★ 529
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Swift C
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-21
Forks ⑂ 3.8K ⑂ 50
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick lottie-ios if

  • You weight community size — 27K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Swift
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full lottie-ios profile →

pick openharness if

  • You want the openharness feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You evaluated both and openharness fits your workflow better

full openharness profile →

About lottie-ios

Lottie for iOS is an Apache 2.0 Swift library that natively renders After Effects and bodymovin JSON vector animations in realtime on iOS, macOS, tvOS, and visionOS, and it is aimed at Apple platform developers who want to ship designer authored motion without rebuilding it by hand in code.

read the full lottie-ios overview →

About openharness

OpenHarness is MIT licensed open source software and hardware, written in C, that gives people who build with coding agents one place to run those agents alongside domain tools and live viewers for work beyond software — CAD parts, circuit boards, data analysis, and video.

read the full openharness overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 183K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

ant-design vs open-design ant-design vs manim open-design vs manim firecrawl vs openpencil firecrawl vs draw-io firecrawl vs plasmic firecrawl vs quant-ux firecrawl vs grida firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Design & Prototyping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.

lottie-ios vs ant-design lottie-ios vs open-design lottie-ios vs manim lottie-ios vs anime lottie-ios vs hyperframes lottie-ios vs daisyui lottie-ios vs tabler lottie-ios vs motion lottie-ios vs layui lottie-ios vs vant lottie-ios vs primitives lottie-ios vs mojs

Frequently asked questions

Is lottie-ios or openharness more popular?

lottie-ios has 26,882 GitHub stars and openharness has 529. lottie-ios has the larger community by that measure.

Are lottie-ios and openharness free?

Both are open source. lottie-ios is licensed under Apache-2.0 and openharness under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between lottie-ios and openharness?

lottie-ios is written in Swift and openharness in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, lottie-ios or openharness?

Choose lottie-ios if you want the larger community (26,882 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose openharness if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.