head to head · open source

OpenCut vs RapidRAW

OpenCut has 90,124 GitHub stars, 8,900 forks, 378 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. RapidRAW has 10,115 stars, 556 forks, 407 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. OpenCut leads on adoption by 791% (90,124 vs 10,115 stars). OpenCut is written in TypeScript under MIT; RapidRAW is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. OpenCut has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, RapidRAW 5%. RapidRAW was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

OpenCut ★ 90K RapidRAW ★ 10K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

OpenCut RapidRAW
GitHub stars ★ 90K ★ 10K
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-08-10 2026-09-20
Forks ⑂ 8.9K ⑂ 556
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick OpenCut if

  • You weight community size — 90K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full OpenCut profile →

pick RapidRAW if

  • You want the RapidRAW feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and RapidRAW fits your workflow better

full RapidRAW profile →

About OpenCut

OpenCut is a free, MIT licensed video editor that runs in the browser and is being rebuilt to serve web, desktop, and mobile from a single codebase, aimed at creators who want an open source alternative to CapCut.

read the full OpenCut overview →

About RapidRAW

RapidRAW is a free, AGPL 3.0 licensed, GPU accelerated RAW image editor for photographers who want a clean, fast, non destructive editing workflow, shipped as a package under 20 MB for Windows, macOS, Linux and Android.

read the full RapidRAW overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 183K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

opencut vs losslesscut opencut vs sharp opencut vs rembg opencut vs audacity opencut vs filepond opencut vs shotcut opencut vs imagetoolbox opencut vs palmier-pro home-assistant vs opencut opencut vs fleetbase firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

OpenCut vs LosslessCut OpenCut vs sharp OpenCut vs rembg OpenCut vs Audacity OpenCut vs filepond OpenCut vs Shotcut OpenCut vs ImageToolbox OpenCut vs palmier-pro OpenCut vs Darktable OpenCut vs libvips OpenCut vs imgproxy OpenCut vs Krita

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenCut or RapidRAW more popular?

OpenCut has 90,124 GitHub stars and RapidRAW has 10,115. OpenCut has the larger community by that measure.

Are OpenCut and RapidRAW free?

Both are open source. OpenCut is licensed under MIT and RapidRAW under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between OpenCut and RapidRAW?

OpenCut is written in TypeScript and RapidRAW in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, OpenCut or RapidRAW?

Choose OpenCut if you want the larger community (90,124 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose RapidRAW if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.