head to head · open source

OpenCut vs Concat

OpenCut has 90,710 GitHub stars, 8,968 forks, 378 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Concat has 3,750 stars, 342 forks, 44 open issues and last shipped yesterday. OpenCut leads on adoption by 2,319% (90,710 vs 3,750 stars). OpenCut is written in TypeScript under MIT; Concat is written in Rust under AGPL-3.0. OpenCut has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, Concat 9%. Concat was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

OpenCut ★ 91K Concat ★ 3.8K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

OpenCut Concat
GitHub stars ★ 91K ★ 3.8K
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript Rust
Last push 2026-09-24 2026-09-26
Forks ⑂ 9.0K ⑂ 342
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick OpenCut if

  • You weight community size — 91K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full OpenCut profile →

pick Concat if

  • You want the Concat feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and Concat fits your workflow better

full Concat profile →

About OpenCut

OpenCut is a free, MIT licensed video editor that runs in the browser and is being rebuilt to serve web, desktop, and mobile from a single codebase, aimed at creators who want an open source alternative to CapCut.

read the full OpenCut overview →

About Concat

Concat is a free, open source, cross platform video editor for macOS, Windows, Linux and Android, built as a CapCut replacement for people making TikTok, Reels, Shorts and YouTube videos, and also usable by scripts and AI agents through its API.

read the full Concat overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 185K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 98K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

opencut vs losslesscut opencut vs sharp opencut vs rembg opencut vs audacity opencut vs filepond opencut vs shotcut opencut vs imagetoolbox opencut vs palmier-pro home-assistant vs opencut opencut vs fleetbase firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

OpenCut vs LosslessCut OpenCut vs sharp OpenCut vs rembg OpenCut vs Audacity OpenCut vs filepond OpenCut vs Shotcut OpenCut vs ImageToolbox OpenCut vs palmier-pro OpenCut vs Darktable OpenCut vs libvips OpenCut vs imgproxy OpenCut vs Krita

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenCut or Concat more popular?

OpenCut has 90,710 GitHub stars and Concat has 3,750. OpenCut has the larger community by that measure.

Are OpenCut and Concat free?

Both are open source. OpenCut is licensed under MIT and Concat under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between OpenCut and Concat?

OpenCut is written in TypeScript and Concat in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, OpenCut or Concat?

Choose OpenCut if you want the larger community (90,710 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Concat if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.