head to head · open source

OpenCut vs PixImagePicker

OpenCut has 90,710 GitHub stars, 8,968 forks, 378 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. PixImagePicker has 871 stars, 219 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped 6 months ago. OpenCut leads on adoption by 10,314% (90,710 vs 871 stars). OpenCut is written in TypeScript under MIT; PixImagePicker is written in Kotlin under Apache-2.0. OpenCut has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, PixImagePicker 25%. OpenCut was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

OpenCut ★ 91K PixImagePicker ★ 871 category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

OpenCut PixImagePicker
GitHub stars ★ 91K ★ 871
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript Kotlin
Last push 2026-09-24 2026-04-15
Forks ⑂ 9.0K ⑂ 219
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick OpenCut if

  • You weight community size — 91K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full OpenCut profile →

pick PixImagePicker if

  • You want the PixImagePicker feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Kotlin
  • You evaluated both and PixImagePicker fits your workflow better

full PixImagePicker profile →

About OpenCut

OpenCut is a free, MIT licensed video editor that runs in the browser and is being rebuilt to serve web, desktop, and mobile from a single codebase, aimed at creators who want an open source alternative to CapCut.

read the full OpenCut overview →

About PixImagePicker

PixImagePicker (Pix) is an Apache 2.0 Kotlin library for Android that reproduces the WhatsApp image and video picker inside an existing app, aimed at Android developers who need a gallery, camera and video selection flow without building one from scratch.

read the full PixImagePicker overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 185K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 98K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

opencut vs losslesscut opencut vs sharp opencut vs rembg opencut vs audacity opencut vs filepond opencut vs shotcut opencut vs imagetoolbox opencut vs palmier-pro home-assistant vs opencut opencut vs fleetbase firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

OpenCut vs LosslessCut OpenCut vs sharp OpenCut vs rembg OpenCut vs Audacity OpenCut vs filepond OpenCut vs Shotcut OpenCut vs ImageToolbox OpenCut vs palmier-pro OpenCut vs Darktable OpenCut vs libvips OpenCut vs imgproxy OpenCut vs Krita

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenCut or PixImagePicker more popular?

OpenCut has 90,710 GitHub stars and PixImagePicker has 871. OpenCut has the larger community by that measure.

Are OpenCut and PixImagePicker free?

Both are open source. OpenCut is licensed under MIT and PixImagePicker under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between OpenCut and PixImagePicker?

OpenCut is written in TypeScript and PixImagePicker in Kotlin. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, OpenCut or PixImagePicker?

Choose OpenCut if you want the larger community (90,710 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose PixImagePicker if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.