head to head · open source

OpenCut vs photoview

OpenCut has 89,763 GitHub stars, 8,865 forks, 378 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. photoview has 6,528 stars, 485 forks, 189 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. OpenCut leads on adoption by 1,275% (89,763 vs 6,528 stars). OpenCut is written in TypeScript under MIT; photoview is written in Go under AGPL-3.0. OpenCut has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, photoview 7%. photoview was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

OpenCut ★ 90K photoview ★ 6.5K category Miscellaneous

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

OpenCut photoview
GitHub stars ★ 90K ★ 6.5K
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript Go
Last push 2026-08-10 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 8.9K ⑂ 485
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick OpenCut if

  • You weight community size — 90K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full OpenCut profile →

pick photoview if

  • You want the photoview feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and photoview fits your workflow better

full photoview profile →

About OpenCut

OpenCut is a free, MIT licensed video editor that runs in the browser and is being rebuilt to serve web, desktop, and mobile from a single codebase, aimed at creators who want an open source alternative to CapCut.

read the full OpenCut overview →

About photoview

Photoview is an AGPL 3.0 licensed photo and video gallery server written in Go that scans an existing folder of media on a self hosted machine and serves it as a fast, browsable website built for photographers.

read the full photoview overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

opencut vs losslesscut opencut vs audacity opencut vs shotcut opencut vs darktable opencut vs krita opencut vs openshot opencut vs gimp opencut vs kdenlive home-assistant vs opencut opencut vs cratedb opencut vs fleetbase firecrawl vs godot firecrawl vs gdevelop godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

OpenCut vs LosslessCut OpenCut vs sharp OpenCut vs rembg OpenCut vs Audacity OpenCut vs filepond OpenCut vs Shotcut OpenCut vs ImageToolbox OpenCut vs palmier-pro OpenCut vs Darktable OpenCut vs Krita OpenCut vs TagStudio OpenCut vs OpenShot

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenCut or photoview more popular?

OpenCut has 89,763 GitHub stars and photoview has 6,528. OpenCut has the larger community by that measure.

Are OpenCut and photoview free?

Both are open source. OpenCut is licensed under MIT and photoview under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between OpenCut and photoview?

OpenCut is written in TypeScript and photoview in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, OpenCut or photoview?

Choose OpenCut if you want the larger community (89,763 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose photoview if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.