head to head · open source

OpenCut vs pho

OpenCut has 90,465 GitHub stars, 8,941 forks, 378 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. pho has 1,165 stars, 95 forks, 55 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. OpenCut leads on adoption by 7,665% (90,465 vs 1,165 stars). OpenCut is written in TypeScript under MIT; pho is written in Dart under GPL-3.0. OpenCut has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, pho 8%. pho was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

OpenCut ★ 90K pho ★ 1.2K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

OpenCut pho
GitHub stars ★ 90K ★ 1.2K
License MIT GPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript Dart
Last push 2026-08-10 2026-08-20
Forks ⑂ 8.9K ⑂ 95
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick OpenCut if

  • You weight community size — 90K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full OpenCut profile →

pick pho if

  • You want the pho feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Dart
  • You evaluated both and pho fits your workflow better

full pho profile →

About OpenCut

OpenCut is a free, MIT licensed video editor that runs in the browser and is being rebuilt to serve web, desktop, and mobile from a single codebase, aimed at creators who want an open source alternative to CapCut.

read the full OpenCut overview →

About pho

Pho is a serverless photo gallery and synchronization application, written in Dart with Flutter and an embedded Go backend, that lets people browse the photos on their phone and incrementally back them up to network storage they already own, and it is aimed at Android and iOS users who want to replace the built in gallery app.

read the full pho overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 183K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 98K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

opencut vs losslesscut opencut vs sharp opencut vs rembg opencut vs audacity opencut vs filepond opencut vs shotcut opencut vs imagetoolbox opencut vs palmier-pro home-assistant vs opencut opencut vs fleetbase firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

OpenCut vs LosslessCut OpenCut vs sharp OpenCut vs rembg OpenCut vs Audacity OpenCut vs filepond OpenCut vs Shotcut OpenCut vs ImageToolbox OpenCut vs palmier-pro OpenCut vs Darktable OpenCut vs libvips OpenCut vs imgproxy OpenCut vs Krita

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenCut or pho more popular?

OpenCut has 90,465 GitHub stars and pho has 1,165. OpenCut has the larger community by that measure.

Are OpenCut and pho free?

Both are open source. OpenCut is licensed under MIT and pho under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between OpenCut and pho?

OpenCut is written in TypeScript and pho in Dart. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, OpenCut or pho?

Choose OpenCut if you want the larger community (90,465 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose pho if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.