head to head · open source

OpenCut vs OSS-DocumentScanner

OpenCut has 93,143 GitHub stars, 9,140 forks, 378 open issues and last shipped 14 days ago. OSS-DocumentScanner has 2,531 stars, 131 forks, 84 open issues and last shipped yesterday. OpenCut leads on adoption by 3,580% (93,143 vs 2,531 stars). OpenCut is written in TypeScript under MIT; OSS-DocumentScanner is written in C++ under MIT. OpenCut has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, OSS-DocumentScanner 5%. OSS-DocumentScanner was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

OpenCut ★ 93K OSS-DocumentScanner ★ 2.5K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

OpenCut OSS-DocumentScanner
GitHub stars ★ 93K ★ 2.5K
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript C++
Last push 2026-09-24 2026-10-07
Forks ⑂ 9.1K ⑂ 131
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick OpenCut if

  • You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full OpenCut profile →

pick OSS-DocumentScanner if

  • You want the OSS-DocumentScanner feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You evaluated both and OSS-DocumentScanner fits your workflow better

full OSS-DocumentScanner profile →

About OpenCut

OpenCut is a free, MIT licensed video editor that runs in the browser and is being rebuilt to serve web, desktop, and mobile from a single codebase, aimed at creators who want an open source alternative to CapCut.

read the full OpenCut overview →

About OSS-DocumentScanner

OSS Document Scanner is an open source Android application, written in C++ and released under the MIT licence, that turns photographed pages into searchable text and PDF documents for users who want a scanner app they can inspect and rebuild themselves.

read the full OSS-DocumentScanner overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 190K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K open-design ★ 100K ant-design ★ 100K manim ★ 95K

Related comparisons

opencut vs losslesscut opencut vs sharp opencut vs rembg opencut vs audacity opencut vs filepond opencut vs shotcut opencut vs imagetoolbox opencut vs palmier-pro home-assistant vs opencut opencut vs fleetbase firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

OpenCut vs LosslessCut OpenCut vs sharp OpenCut vs rembg OpenCut vs Audacity OpenCut vs filepond OpenCut vs Shotcut OpenCut vs ImageToolbox OpenCut vs palmier-pro OpenCut vs Darktable OpenCut vs libvips OpenCut vs imgproxy OpenCut vs Krita

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenCut or OSS-DocumentScanner more popular?

OpenCut has 93,143 GitHub stars and OSS-DocumentScanner has 2,531. OpenCut has the larger community by that measure.

Are OpenCut and OSS-DocumentScanner free?

Both are open source. OpenCut is licensed under MIT and OSS-DocumentScanner under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between OpenCut and OSS-DocumentScanner?

OpenCut is written in TypeScript and OSS-DocumentScanner in C++. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, OpenCut or OSS-DocumentScanner?

Choose OpenCut if you want the larger community (93,143 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose OSS-DocumentScanner if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.