head to head · open source

OpenCut vs openscreen

OpenCut has 89,763 GitHub stars, 8,865 forks, 378 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. openscreen has 3,046 stars, 191 forks, 43 open issues and last shipped yesterday. OpenCut leads on adoption by 2,847% (89,763 vs 3,046 stars). OpenCut is written in TypeScript under MIT; openscreen is written in TypeScript under MIT. OpenCut has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, openscreen 6%. openscreen was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

OpenCut ★ 90K openscreen ★ 3.0K category Miscellaneous

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

OpenCut openscreen
GitHub stars ★ 90K ★ 3.0K
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-08-10 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 8.9K ⑂ 191
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick OpenCut if

  • You weight community size — 90K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full OpenCut profile →

pick openscreen if

  • You want the openscreen feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and openscreen fits your workflow better

full openscreen profile →

About OpenCut

OpenCut is a free, MIT licensed video editor that runs in the browser and is being rebuilt to serve web, desktop, and mobile from a single codebase, aimed at creators who want an open source alternative to CapCut.

read the full OpenCut overview →

About openscreen

OpenScreen is a free, MIT licensed, GPU accelerated desktop screen recorder and video editor for Windows, macOS, and Linux that turns a raw capture into a polished product demo, aimed at developers, product teams, and technical marketers who need demo video without subscriptions or watermarks.

read the full openscreen overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

opencut vs losslesscut opencut vs audacity opencut vs shotcut opencut vs darktable opencut vs krita opencut vs openshot opencut vs gimp opencut vs kdenlive home-assistant vs opencut opencut vs cratedb opencut vs fleetbase firecrawl vs godot firecrawl vs gdevelop godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

OpenCut vs LosslessCut OpenCut vs sharp OpenCut vs rembg OpenCut vs Audacity OpenCut vs filepond OpenCut vs Shotcut OpenCut vs ImageToolbox OpenCut vs palmier-pro OpenCut vs Darktable OpenCut vs Krita OpenCut vs TagStudio OpenCut vs photoview

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenCut or openscreen more popular?

OpenCut has 89,763 GitHub stars and openscreen has 3,046. OpenCut has the larger community by that measure.

Are OpenCut and openscreen free?

Both are open source. OpenCut is licensed under MIT and openscreen under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between OpenCut and openscreen?

OpenCut is written in TypeScript and openscreen in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, OpenCut or openscreen?

Choose OpenCut if you want the larger community (89,763 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose openscreen if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.