head to head · open source

OpenCut vs Foxel

OpenCut has 90,568 GitHub stars, 8,951 forks, 378 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. Foxel has 1,063 stars, 92 forks, 10 open issues and last shipped 7 days ago. OpenCut leads on adoption by 8,420% (90,568 vs 1,063 stars). OpenCut is written in TypeScript under MIT; Foxel is written in Python under MIT. OpenCut has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, Foxel 9%. Foxel was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

OpenCut ★ 91K Foxel ★ 1.1K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

OpenCut Foxel
GitHub stars ★ 91K ★ 1.1K
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript Python
Last push 2026-08-10 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 9.0K ⑂ 92
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick OpenCut if

  • You weight community size — 91K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full OpenCut profile →

pick Foxel if

  • You want the Foxel feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and Foxel fits your workflow better

full Foxel profile →

About OpenCut

OpenCut is a free, MIT licensed video editor that runs in the browser and is being rebuilt to serve web, desktop, and mobile from a single codebase, aimed at creators who want an open source alternative to CapCut.

read the full OpenCut overview →

About Foxel

Foxel is an MIT licensed, self hosted private cloud storage server for individuals and teams that gathers files spread across local disks, S3 compatible buckets, WebDAV, SFTP, FTP and consumer cloud drives into one interface and adds AI powered semantic search over images, documents and other unstructured content.

read the full Foxel overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 184K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 98K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

opencut vs losslesscut opencut vs sharp opencut vs rembg opencut vs audacity opencut vs filepond opencut vs shotcut opencut vs imagetoolbox opencut vs palmier-pro home-assistant vs opencut opencut vs fleetbase firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

OpenCut vs LosslessCut OpenCut vs sharp OpenCut vs rembg OpenCut vs Audacity OpenCut vs filepond OpenCut vs Shotcut OpenCut vs ImageToolbox OpenCut vs palmier-pro OpenCut vs Darktable OpenCut vs libvips OpenCut vs imgproxy OpenCut vs Krita

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenCut or Foxel more popular?

OpenCut has 90,568 GitHub stars and Foxel has 1,063. OpenCut has the larger community by that measure.

Are OpenCut and Foxel free?

Both are open source. OpenCut is licensed under MIT and Foxel under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between OpenCut and Foxel?

OpenCut is written in TypeScript and Foxel in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, OpenCut or Foxel?

Choose OpenCut if you want the larger community (90,568 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Foxel if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.