head to head · open source

OpenCut vs foldergram

OpenCut has 98,300 GitHub stars, 9,821 forks, 378 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. foldergram has 606 stars, 36 forks, 18 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. OpenCut leads on adoption by 16,121% (98,300 vs 606 stars). OpenCut is written in TypeScript under MIT; foldergram is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. OpenCut has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, foldergram 6%. foldergram was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

OpenCut ★ 98K foldergram ★ 606 category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

OpenCut foldergram
GitHub stars ★ 98K ★ 606
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-24 2026-11-08
Forks ⑂ 9.8K ⑂ 36
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick OpenCut if

  • You weight community size — 98K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full OpenCut profile →

pick foldergram if

  • You want the foldergram feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and foldergram fits your workflow better

full foldergram profile →

About OpenCut

OpenCut A free and open source video editor for web, desktop, and mobile. Status OpenCut is being rewritten from the ground up. What's coming: An Editor API First class third party plugins (made possible by a plugin first architecture) Desktop, mobile, and browser from one codebase (Rust core) MCP server (for AI agents) Headless mode (automation, batch rendering) A scripting tab directly in the editor You can still find the previous version at opencut app/opencut classic, which is the one to reach for today. opencut.app still runs the classic version. The rewrite will live at new.opencut.app until it's ready to…

read the full OpenCut overview →

About foldergram

Foldergram Local only photo and video gallery for folders, with an Instagram inspired browsing pattern. Live Demo • Features • Installation • Configuration • Tech Stack • Contributing Try the public demo: foldergram.intentdeep.com Foldergram is a self hosted web application that turns your local folders into a beautiful, instagram style feed and profile. It turns your local folder to app folders (profiles), and serves a lightning fast Progressive Web App (PWA). Foldergram indexes supported media from a configured GALLERY ROOT , stores metadata in SQLite, generates thumbnails and previews, and serves a fast feed…

read the full foldergram overview →

More in Miscellaneous

Related comparisons

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenCut or foldergram more popular?

OpenCut has 98,300 GitHub stars and foldergram has 606. OpenCut has the larger community by that measure.

Are OpenCut and foldergram free?

Both are open source. OpenCut is licensed under MIT and foldergram under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between OpenCut and foldergram?

OpenCut is written in TypeScript and foldergram in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, OpenCut or foldergram?

Choose OpenCut if you want the larger community (98,300 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose foldergram if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.