head to head · open source

OpenCut vs chronoframe

OpenCut has 97,269 GitHub stars, 9,679 forks, 378 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. chronoframe has 1,969 stars, 155 forks, 51 open issues and last shipped today. OpenCut leads on adoption by 4,840% (97,269 vs 1,969 stars). OpenCut is written in TypeScript under MIT; chronoframe is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. OpenCut has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, chronoframe 8%. chronoframe was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

OpenCut ★ 97K chronoframe ★ 2.0K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

OpenCut chronoframe
GitHub stars ★ 97K ★ 2.0K
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-24 2026-11-04
Forks ⑂ 9.7K ⑂ 155
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick OpenCut if

  • You weight community size — 97K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full OpenCut profile →

pick chronoframe if

  • You want the chronoframe feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and chronoframe fits your workflow better

full chronoframe profile →

About OpenCut

OpenCut A free and open source video editor for web, desktop, and mobile. Status OpenCut is being rewritten from the ground up. What's coming: An Editor API First class third party plugins (made possible by a plugin first architecture) Desktop, mobile, and browser from one codebase (Rust core) MCP server (for AI agents) Headless mode (automation, batch rendering) A scripting tab directly in the editor You can still find the previous version at opencut app/opencut classic, which is the one to reach for today. opencut.app still runs the classic version. The rewrite will live at new.opencut.app until it's ready to…

read the full OpenCut overview →

About chronoframe

ChronoFrame Languages: English 中文 A smooth photo display and management application, supporting multiple image formats and large size image rendering. Live Demo: TimoYin's Mems ✨ Features 🖼️ Powerful Photo Management Manage photos online Easily manage and browse photos via the web interface Explore map Browse photo locations on a map Smart EXIF parsing Automatically extracts metadata such as capture time, geolocation, and camera parameters Reverse geocoding Automatically identifies photo shooting locations Multi format support Supports mainstream formats including JPEG, PNG, HEIC/HEIF Smart thumbnails Efficient…

read the full chronoframe overview →

More in Miscellaneous

Related comparisons

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenCut or chronoframe more popular?

OpenCut has 97,269 GitHub stars and chronoframe has 1,969. OpenCut has the larger community by that measure.

Are OpenCut and chronoframe free?

Both are open source. OpenCut is licensed under MIT and chronoframe under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between OpenCut and chronoframe?

OpenCut is written in TypeScript and chronoframe in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, OpenCut or chronoframe?

Choose OpenCut if you want the larger community (97,269 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose chronoframe if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.