head to head · open source

Invidious vs swingmusic

Invidious has 24,469 GitHub stars, 2,746 forks, 480 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. swingmusic has 2,062 stars, 135 forks, 124 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. Invidious leads on adoption by 1,087% (24,469 vs 2,062 stars). Invidious is written in Crystal under AGPL-3.0; swingmusic is written in Python under AGPL-3.0. Invidious has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, swingmusic 7%. Invidious was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Invidious ★ 24K swingmusic ★ 2.1K category Miscellaneous

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Invidious swingmusic
GitHub stars ★ 24K ★ 2.1K
License AGPL-3.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in Crystal Python
Last push 2026-09-16 2026-08-16
Forks ⑂ 2.7K ⑂ 135
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Invidious if

  • You weight community size — 24K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Crystal
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Invidious profile →

pick swingmusic if

  • You want the swingmusic feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and swingmusic fits your workflow better

full swingmusic profile →

About Invidious

Invidious is an open source, AGPL 3.0 alternative front end to YouTube, written in Crystal, aimed at people who want to watch videos without ads, tracking, or a Google account.

read the full Invidious overview →

About swingmusic

Swing Music is a self hosted music server and browser based player for local audio files. It is written in Python and licensed under AGPL 3.0. It sits in the open source self hosted media streaming ecosystem and is positioned as a Spotify like experience for music the user already owns.

read the full swingmusic overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K Home Assistant ★ 91K OpenCut ★ 90K OpenBB ★ 73K Jellyfin ★ 57K

Related comparisons

jellyfin vs invidious jellyfin vs navidrome jellyfin vs neko jellyfin vs kodi jellyfin vs nuclear jellyfin vs peertube jellyfin vs iptv-sources jellyfin vs ansible-nas firecrawl vs godot godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs cratedb opencut vs cratedb

More Media & Streaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Media & Streaming field.

Invidious vs Jellyfin Invidious vs Navidrome Invidious vs neko Invidious vs Kodi Invidious vs Nuclear Invidious vs PeerTube Invidious vs iptv-sources Invidious vs ansible-nas Invidious vs Anthias Invidious vs tvheadend Invidious vs Ghosten-Player Invidious vs BookWyrm

Frequently asked questions

Is Invidious or swingmusic more popular?

Invidious has 24,469 GitHub stars and swingmusic has 2,062. Invidious has the larger community by that measure.

Are Invidious and swingmusic free?

Both are open source. Invidious is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and swingmusic under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Invidious and swingmusic?

Invidious is written in Crystal and swingmusic in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Invidious or swingmusic?

Choose Invidious if you want the larger community (24,469 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose swingmusic if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.