head to head · open source

Invidious vs tvheadend

Invidious has 24,469 GitHub stars, 2,746 forks, 480 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. tvheadend has 3,521 stars, 975 forks, 107 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. Invidious leads on adoption by 595% (24,469 vs 3,521 stars). Invidious is written in Crystal under AGPL-3.0; tvheadend is written in C under GPL-3.0. Invidious has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, tvheadend 28%. Invidious was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Invidious ★ 24K tvheadend ★ 3.5K category Miscellaneous

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Invidious tvheadend
GitHub stars ★ 24K ★ 3.5K
License AGPL-3.0 GPL-3.0
Written in Crystal C
Last push 2026-09-16 2026-09-14
Forks ⑂ 2.7K ⑂ 975
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Invidious if

  • You weight community size — 24K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Crystal
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Invidious profile →

pick tvheadend if

  • You want the tvheadend feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You evaluated both and tvheadend fits your workflow better

full tvheadend profile →

About Invidious

Invidious is an open source, AGPL 3.0 alternative front end to YouTube, written in Crystal, aimed at people who want to watch videos without ads, tracking, or a Google account.

read the full Invidious overview →

About tvheadend

Tvheadend is an open source TV streaming server and digital video recorder for Linux. It lives in the Linux media and streaming ecosystem, and it is written in C under the GPL 3.0 license. The project provides a server that can receive television signals and streams from many input types, then make those channels available over the network.

read the full tvheadend overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K Home Assistant ★ 91K OpenCut ★ 90K OpenBB ★ 73K Jellyfin ★ 57K

Related comparisons

jellyfin vs invidious jellyfin vs navidrome jellyfin vs neko jellyfin vs kodi jellyfin vs nuclear jellyfin vs peertube jellyfin vs iptv-sources jellyfin vs ansible-nas firecrawl vs godot godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs cratedb opencut vs cratedb

More Media & Streaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Media & Streaming field.

Invidious vs Jellyfin Invidious vs Navidrome Invidious vs neko Invidious vs Kodi Invidious vs Nuclear Invidious vs PeerTube Invidious vs iptv-sources Invidious vs ansible-nas Invidious vs Anthias Invidious vs Ghosten-Player Invidious vs BookWyrm Invidious vs mytv-android

Frequently asked questions

Is Invidious or tvheadend more popular?

Invidious has 24,469 GitHub stars and tvheadend has 3,521. Invidious has the larger community by that measure.

Are Invidious and tvheadend free?

Both are open source. Invidious is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and tvheadend under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Invidious and tvheadend?

Invidious is written in Crystal and tvheadend in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Invidious or tvheadend?

Choose Invidious if you want the larger community (24,469 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose tvheadend if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.