head to head · open source

Jellyfin vs Invidious

Jellyfin has 57,244 GitHub stars, 5,523 forks, 684 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Invidious has 24,469 stars, 2,746 forks, 480 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Jellyfin leads on adoption by 134% (57,244 vs 24,469 stars). Jellyfin is written in C# under GPL-2.0; Invidious is written in Crystal under AGPL-3.0. Jellyfin has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, Invidious 11%. Jellyfin was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (hacktoberfest), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Jellyfin ★ 57K Invidious ★ 24K category Miscellaneous

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Jellyfin Invidious
GitHub stars ★ 57K ★ 24K
License GPL-2.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in C# Crystal
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-16
Forks ⑂ 5.5K ⑂ 2.7K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Jellyfin if

  • You weight community size — 57K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Jellyfin profile →

pick Invidious if

  • You want the Invidious feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Crystal
  • You evaluated both and Invidious fits your workflow better

full Invidious profile →

About Jellyfin

Jellyfin is a free and open source media server that lets an individual or an organisation manage and stream their own movies, music, and other media from a dedicated server to end user devices through multiple client apps.

read the full Jellyfin overview →

About Invidious

Invidious is an open source, AGPL 3.0 alternative front end to YouTube, written in Crystal, aimed at people who want to watch videos without ads, tracking, or a Google account.

read the full Invidious overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K Home Assistant ★ 91K OpenCut ★ 90K OpenBB ★ 73K LosslessCut ★ 44K

Related comparisons

jellyfin vs navidrome jellyfin vs neko jellyfin vs kodi jellyfin vs nuclear jellyfin vs peertube jellyfin vs iptv-sources jellyfin vs ansible-nas firecrawl vs godot godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs cratedb opencut vs cratedb firecrawl vs novu

More Media & Streaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Media & Streaming field.

Jellyfin vs Navidrome Jellyfin vs neko Jellyfin vs Kodi Jellyfin vs Nuclear Jellyfin vs PeerTube Jellyfin vs iptv-sources Jellyfin vs ansible-nas Jellyfin vs Anthias Jellyfin vs tvheadend Jellyfin vs Ghosten-Player Jellyfin vs BookWyrm Jellyfin vs mytv-android

Frequently asked questions

Is Jellyfin or Invidious more popular?

Jellyfin has 57,244 GitHub stars and Invidious has 24,469. Jellyfin has the larger community by that measure.

Are Jellyfin and Invidious free?

Both are open source. Jellyfin is licensed under GPL-2.0 and Invidious under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Jellyfin and Invidious?

Jellyfin is written in C# and Invidious in Crystal. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Jellyfin or Invidious?

Choose Jellyfin if you want the larger community (57,244 stars) or its GPL-2.0 licence terms. Choose Invidious if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.