head to head · open source

Invidious vs Kodi

Invidious has 24,469 GitHub stars, 2,746 forks, 480 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Kodi has 21,229 stars, 6,598 forks, 466 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Invidious leads on adoption by 15% (24,469 vs 21,229 stars). Invidious is written in Crystal under AGPL-3.0; Kodi is written in C++ under a custom or non-standard licence. Invidious has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, Kodi 31%. Kodi was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (hacktoberfest), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Invidious ★ 24K Kodi ★ 21K category Miscellaneous

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Invidious Kodi
GitHub stars ★ 24K ★ 21K
License AGPL-3.0 Custom / other
Written in Crystal C++
Last push 2026-09-16 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 2.7K ⑂ 6.6K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Invidious if

  • You weight community size — 24K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Crystal
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Invidious profile →

pick Kodi if

  • You want the Kodi feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You evaluated both and Kodi fits your workflow better

full Kodi profile →

About Invidious

Invidious is an open source, AGPL 3.0 alternative front end to YouTube, written in Crystal, aimed at people who want to watch videos without ads, tracking, or a Google account.

read the full Invidious overview →

About Kodi

Kodi is a free and open source home theater and media center application, also described as an entertainment hub for digital media. It is written mainly in C++ and distributed as a native application for Android, BSD, Linux, macOS, iOS, tvOS, and Windows, with support for many common processor architectures. The project began in 2003 and is run by the XBMC Foundation, with development and support carried out by volunteers worldwide.

read the full Kodi overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K Home Assistant ★ 91K OpenCut ★ 90K OpenBB ★ 73K Jellyfin ★ 57K

Related comparisons

jellyfin vs invidious jellyfin vs kodi jellyfin vs navidrome jellyfin vs neko jellyfin vs nuclear jellyfin vs peertube jellyfin vs iptv-sources jellyfin vs ansible-nas firecrawl vs godot godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs cratedb opencut vs cratedb

More Media & Streaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Media & Streaming field.

Invidious vs Jellyfin Invidious vs Navidrome Invidious vs neko Invidious vs Nuclear Invidious vs PeerTube Invidious vs iptv-sources Invidious vs ansible-nas Invidious vs Anthias Invidious vs tvheadend Invidious vs Ghosten-Player Invidious vs BookWyrm Invidious vs mytv-android

Frequently asked questions

Is Invidious or Kodi more popular?

Invidious has 24,469 GitHub stars and Kodi has 21,229. Invidious has the larger community by that measure.

Are Invidious and Kodi free?

Both are open source. Invidious is licensed under AGPL-3.0, and Kodi has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Invidious and Kodi?

Invidious is written in Crystal and Kodi in C++. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Invidious or Kodi?

Choose Invidious if you want the larger community (24,469 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Kodi if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.