head to head · open source

three.js vs colyseus

three.js has 115,666 GitHub stars, 36,556 forks, 386 open issues and last shipped yesterday. colyseus has 7,311 stars, 665 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped today. three.js leads on adoption by 1,482% (115,666 vs 7,311 stars). three.js is written in JavaScript under MIT; colyseus is written in TypeScript under MIT. three.js has attracted 32% as many forks as stars, colyseus 9%. colyseus was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

three.js ★ 116K colyseus ★ 7.3K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

three.js colyseus
GitHub stars ★ 116K ★ 7.3K
License MIT MIT
Written in JavaScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-20
Forks ⑂ 37K ⑂ 665
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick three.js if

  • You weight community size — 116K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full three.js profile →

pick colyseus if

  • You want the colyseus feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and colyseus fits your workflow better

full colyseus profile →

About three.js

three.js is an MIT licensed JavaScript 3D library that provides an easy to use, lightweight, cross browser, general purpose layer for rendering interactive 3D graphics in the browser, aimed at JavaScript developers who need 3D scenes on the web without writing raw GPU code.

read the full three.js overview →

About colyseus

Colyseus is an MIT licensed authoritative multiplayer framework for Node.js that provides synchronizable data structures, room based matchmaking, and client SDKs for TypeScript, React, Unity, Godot, GameMaker, Defold, Construct, Haxe, and C, aimed at developers building realtime and turn based multiplayer games.

read the full colyseus overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K Home Assistant ★ 91K

Related comparisons

godot vs three-js three-js vs imgui three-js vs home-assistant three-js vs hey three-js vs octobot three-js vs fleetbase firecrawl vs godot firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy firecrawl vs home-assistant godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant

More Gaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Gaming field.

three.js vs Godot three.js vs imgui three.js vs bevy three.js vs raylib three.js vs GDevelop three.js vs Babylon.js three.js vs libgdx three.js vs MonoGame three.js vs Pumpkin three.js vs azerothcore-wotlk three.js vs zinx three.js vs agones

Frequently asked questions

Is three.js or colyseus more popular?

three.js has 115,666 GitHub stars and colyseus has 7,311. three.js has the larger community by that measure.

Are three.js and colyseus free?

Both are open source. three.js is licensed under MIT and colyseus under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between three.js and colyseus?

three.js is written in JavaScript and colyseus in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, three.js or colyseus?

Choose three.js if you want the larger community (115,666 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose colyseus if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.