head to head · open source
code-review-graph vs ripwire
code-review-graph has 32,288 GitHub stars, 2,975 forks, 163 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. ripwire has 2,461 stars, 157 forks, 66 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. code-review-graph leads on adoption by 1,212% (32,288 vs 2,461 stars). code-review-graph is written in Python under MIT; ripwire is written in C++ under Apache-2.0. code-review-graph has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, ripwire 6%. ripwire was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (claude-code, code-review), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| code-review-graph | ripwire | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 32K | ★ 2.5K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Python | C++ |
| Last push | 2026-10-16 | 2026-10-20 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.0K | ⑂ 157 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick code-review-graph if
- You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick ripwire if
- You want the ripwire feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches C++
- You evaluated both and ripwire fits your workflow better
About code-review-graph
code review graph Stop burning tokens. Start reviewing smarter. English 简体中文 日本語 한국어 हिन्दी Usage · Commands · FAQ · Troubleshooting · GitHub Action · Reproducing the benchmarks · Roadmap AI coding tools can end up re reading large parts of your codebase on review tasks. code review graph fixes that. It builds a structural map of your code with Tree sitter, tracks changes incrementally, and gives your AI assistant precise context via MCP so it reads only what matters. Quick Start One command sets up everything. install detects which AI coding tools you have, writes the correct MCP configuration for each one…
read the full code-review-graph overview →
About ripwire
Rip'n Fast. Fewer Tokens. Better Code. The ripgrep of AI context. A map before your agent reads the repo — and a check on what it writes. Ranked, deterministic call graph: what to touch, what it breaks, which tests to run. On the edit: blast radius, tests that reach it, twelve quality kinds reporting only what got worse, forgotten co changes, fields read and written, names that resolve more than one way. Just want to use it? Install it with the one line below, then start each coding session by telling your agent to use it, for example: "Use ripwire on this repo." That is all most people need: the install also…
read the full ripwire overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More Version Control & Collaboration projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Version Control & Collaboration field.
Frequently asked questions
Is code-review-graph or ripwire more popular?
code-review-graph has 32,288 GitHub stars and ripwire has 2,461. code-review-graph has the larger community by that measure.
Are code-review-graph and ripwire free?
Both are open source. code-review-graph is licensed under MIT and ripwire under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between code-review-graph and ripwire?
code-review-graph is written in Python and ripwire in C++. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, code-review-graph or ripwire?
Choose code-review-graph if you want the larger community (32,288 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose ripwire if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.