head to head · open source
code-review-graph vs GitComet
code-review-graph has 31,548 GitHub stars, 2,870 forks, 163 open issues and last shipped yesterday. GitComet has 845 stars, 46 forks, 56 open issues and last shipped yesterday. code-review-graph leads on adoption by 3,633% (31,548 vs 845 stars). code-review-graph is written in Python under MIT; GitComet is written in Rust under AGPL-3.0. code-review-graph has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, GitComet 5%. GitComet was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| code-review-graph | GitComet | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 32K | ★ 845 |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Python | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-17 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.9K | ⑂ 46 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick code-review-graph if
- You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick GitComet if
- You want the GitComet feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and GitComet fits your workflow better
About code-review-graph
code review graph is a local first code intelligence graph for MCP and the command line that parses a repository with Tree sitter into a persistent map of functions, classes, imports, calls, inheritance and test coverage, so AI coding assistants read only the files a review actually needs; it is aimed at developers and teams running AI coding tools against large repositories where repeated full codebase reads waste tokens.
read the full code-review-graph overview →
About GitComet
GitComet is a free, local first Git graphical client written in Rust, aimed at developers and teams who need fast browsing, staging, and diffing of very large repositories without their code leaving the machine.
read the full GitComet overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More Version Control & Collaboration projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Version Control & Collaboration field.
Frequently asked questions
Is code-review-graph or GitComet more popular?
code-review-graph has 31,548 GitHub stars and GitComet has 845. code-review-graph has the larger community by that measure.
Are code-review-graph and GitComet free?
Both are open source. code-review-graph is licensed under MIT and GitComet under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between code-review-graph and GitComet?
code-review-graph is written in Python and GitComet in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, code-review-graph or GitComet?
Choose code-review-graph if you want the larger community (31,548 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose GitComet if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.