head to head · open source
code-review-graph vs crit
code-review-graph has 32,563 GitHub stars, 2,964 forks, 163 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. crit has 1,266 stars, 105 forks, 22 open issues and last shipped yesterday. code-review-graph leads on adoption by 2,472% (32,563 vs 1,266 stars). code-review-graph is written in Python under MIT; crit is written in Go under MIT. code-review-graph has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, crit 8%. crit was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (code-review, llm), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| code-review-graph | crit | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 33K | ★ 1.3K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Go |
| Last push | 2026-10-29 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.0K | ⑂ 105 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick code-review-graph if
- You weight community size — 33K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick crit if
- You want the crit feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and crit fits your workflow better
About code-review-graph
code review graph Stop burning tokens. Start reviewing smarter. English 简体中文 日本語 한국어 हिन्दी Usage · Commands · FAQ · Troubleshooting · GitHub Action · Reproducing the benchmarks · Roadmap AI coding tools can end up re reading large parts of your codebase on review tasks. code review graph fixes that. It builds a structural map of your code with Tree sitter, tracks changes incrementally, and gives your AI assistant precise context via MCP so it reads only what matters. Quick Start One command sets up everything. install detects which AI coding tools you have, writes the correct MCP configuration for each one…
read the full code-review-graph overview →
About crit
Crit Review and comment on plans, code diffs, frontend elements and send feedback directly to your agent. Adaptive UI for each type of output For agents, plans and code are all the same it's just text, but for us, humans, reviewing generated plans and reviewing web application are two very different activities. Crit adds a proper interface for each type of output and lets you point at the exact thing that is wrong and leave a comment for the agent to fix: crit plan.md renders a markdown file with proper formatting and review UI crit auto detects git changes and shows syntax highlighted diffs for local review…
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More Version Control & Collaboration projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Version Control & Collaboration field.
Frequently asked questions
Is code-review-graph or crit more popular?
code-review-graph has 32,563 GitHub stars and crit has 1,266. code-review-graph has the larger community by that measure.
Are code-review-graph and crit free?
Both are open source. code-review-graph is licensed under MIT and crit under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between code-review-graph and crit?
code-review-graph is written in Python and crit in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, code-review-graph or crit?
Choose code-review-graph if you want the larger community (32,563 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose crit if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.