head to head · open source
code-review-graph vs brooks-lint
code-review-graph has 32,355 GitHub stars, 2,957 forks, 163 open issues and last shipped 9 days ago. brooks-lint has 1,542 stars, 72 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped yesterday. code-review-graph leads on adoption by 1,998% (32,355 vs 1,542 stars). code-review-graph is written in Python under MIT; brooks-lint is written in HTML under MIT. code-review-graph has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, brooks-lint 5%. brooks-lint was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (code-review), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| code-review-graph | brooks-lint | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 32K | ★ 1.5K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | HTML |
| Last push | 2026-10-16 | 2026-10-24 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.0K | ⑂ 72 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick code-review-graph if
- You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick brooks-lint if
- You want the brooks-lint feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches HTML
- You evaluated both and brooks-lint fits your workflow better
About code-review-graph
code review graph Stop burning tokens. Start reviewing smarter. English 简体中文 日本語 한국어 हिन्दी Usage · Commands · FAQ · Troubleshooting · GitHub Action · Reproducing the benchmarks · Roadmap AI coding tools can end up re reading large parts of your codebase on review tasks. code review graph fixes that. It builds a structural map of your code with Tree sitter, tracks changes incrementally, and gives your AI assistant precise context via MCP so it reads only what matters. Quick Start One command sets up everything. install detects which AI coding tools you have, writes the correct MCP configuration for each one…
read the full code-review-graph overview →
About brooks-lint
brooks lint AI code reviews grounded in twelve classic engineering books. Consistent. Traceable. Actionable. English · 简体中文 · 繁體中文 · 日本語 · 한국어 · Español Quick Start • The Six Decay Risks • What It Looks Like • Benchmark • Installation → Visit the website "The bearing of a child takes nine months, no matter how many women are assigned." — Frederick Brooks, The Mythical Man Month (1975) 50 years later, Brooks was still right — and so were McConnell, Fowler, Martin, Hunt & Thomas, Evans, Ousterhout, Winters, Meszaros, Osherove, Feathers, and the Google Testing team. Most code quality tools count lines and…
read the full brooks-lint overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More Version Control & Collaboration projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Version Control & Collaboration field.
Frequently asked questions
Is code-review-graph or brooks-lint more popular?
code-review-graph has 32,355 GitHub stars and brooks-lint has 1,542. code-review-graph has the larger community by that measure.
Are code-review-graph and brooks-lint free?
Both are open source. code-review-graph is licensed under MIT and brooks-lint under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between code-review-graph and brooks-lint?
code-review-graph is written in Python and brooks-lint in HTML. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, code-review-graph or brooks-lint?
Choose code-review-graph if you want the larger community (32,355 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose brooks-lint if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.