head to head · open source
code-review-graph vs 0security
code-review-graph has 32,774 GitHub stars, 2,979 forks, 163 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. 0security has 1,356 stars, 179 forks, 5 open issues and last shipped today. code-review-graph leads on adoption by 2,317% (32,774 vs 1,356 stars). code-review-graph is written in Python under MIT; 0security is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. code-review-graph has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, 0security 13%. 0security was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (code-review, mcp), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| code-review-graph | 0security | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 33K | ★ 1.4K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Python | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-12 | 2026-11-15 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.0K | ⑂ 179 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick code-review-graph if
- You weight community size — 33K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick 0security if
- You want the 0security feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and 0security fits your workflow better
About code-review-graph
code review graph Stop burning tokens. Start reviewing smarter. English 简体中文 日本語 한국어 हिन्दी Usage · Commands · FAQ · Troubleshooting · GitHub Action · Reproducing the benchmarks · Roadmap AI coding tools can end up re reading large parts of your codebase on review tasks. code review graph fixes that. It builds a structural map of your code with Tree sitter, tracks changes incrementally, and gives your AI assistant precise context via MCP so it reads only what matters. Quick Start One command sets up everything. install detects which AI coding tools you have, writes the correct MCP configuration for each one…
read the full code-review-graph overview →
About 0security
Continuous security agents for your whole tech stack By the Swiss Applied AI & Cybersecurity Research Lab Backed by 0security is an open source framework for building and deploying security agents. They find vulnerabilities across your code, dependencies, infrastructure, LLM apps and AI agents, prove them, fix them, verify the fix and keep watching. It runs on your own infrastructure, with the LLMs you choose. Quick start Prefer the terminal? Windows, Docker and source installs Windows (experimental): download 0 windows x64.exe from Releases. Docker : docker run rm ghcr.io/0sec labs/0security:latest help . See…
read the full 0security overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More Version Control & Collaboration projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Version Control & Collaboration field.
Frequently asked questions
Is code-review-graph or 0security more popular?
code-review-graph has 32,774 GitHub stars and 0security has 1,356. code-review-graph has the larger community by that measure.
Are code-review-graph and 0security free?
Both are open source. code-review-graph is licensed under MIT and 0security under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between code-review-graph and 0security?
code-review-graph is written in Python and 0security in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, code-review-graph or 0security?
Choose code-review-graph if you want the larger community (32,774 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose 0security if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.