head to head · open source
AutoMQ vs Workbench
AutoMQ has 10,920 GitHub stars, 800 forks, 60 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Workbench has 454 stars, 47 forks, 31 open issues and last shipped 5 months ago. AutoMQ leads on adoption by 2,305% (10,920 vs 454 stars). AutoMQ is written in Java under Apache-2.0; Workbench is written in TypeScript under MIT. AutoMQ has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, Workbench 10%. AutoMQ was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| AutoMQ | Workbench | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 11K | ★ 454 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Java | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-06-01 |
| Forks | ⑂ 800 | ⑂ 47 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick AutoMQ if
- You weight community size — 11K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Workbench if
- You want the Workbench feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and Workbench fits your workflow better
About AutoMQ
Diskless Kafka® on S3, Offering 10x Cost Savings and Scaling in Seconds. 📑  Documentation     🔥  Explore AutoMQ Playground Now     yellow) orange) From 6 Hours to Seconds: How Grab Achieved 3x Data Streaming Efficiency with AutoMQ Tencent Cloud EMR uses AutoMQ as a first party service 2.2B Messages a Day: LG U+ Modernizes Log Pipelines with AutoMQ on AWS Geely: Powering Hybrid Cloud Streaming for a 10 Million Vehicle Fleet Bambu Lab: Unifying Multi Cloud Data Streaming with Stateless Kafka Honda: Slashing Kafka TCO by 50% with Cloud Native Diskless Architecture Avia Games…
read the full AutoMQ overview →
About Workbench
Workbench Open source BullMQ dashboard. Drop in for any Node or Bun backend. Workbench is a modern dashboard for BullMQ. Runs jobs, flows, schedulers and metrics, all served from your own backend behind your own auth. Zero infrastructure — mounts as a route in your existing app, or run as a standalone Docker container Adapters for Hono, Elysia, Express, Fastify, Koa, NestJS, AdonisJS, Next.js, TanStack Start, Astro, Nuxt, Bun.serve, and h3 Standalone image on GHCR ( ghcr.io/ /workbench standalone ) for Docker / Kubernetes deployments MCP server for Cursor, Claude Desktop, Zed, and Continue.dev — drive your…
read the full Workbench overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Messaging & Event Streaming projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Messaging & Event Streaming field.
Frequently asked questions
Is AutoMQ or Workbench more popular?
AutoMQ has 10,920 GitHub stars and Workbench has 454. AutoMQ has the larger community by that measure.
Are AutoMQ and Workbench free?
Both are open source. AutoMQ is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Workbench under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between AutoMQ and Workbench?
AutoMQ is written in Java and Workbench in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, AutoMQ or Workbench?
Choose AutoMQ if you want the larger community (10,920 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Workbench if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.