head to head · open source

Audacity vs photoview

Audacity has 18,477 GitHub stars, 2,668 forks, 1,781 open issues and last shipped yesterday. photoview has 6,528 stars, 485 forks, 189 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Audacity leads on adoption by 183% (18,477 vs 6,528 stars). Audacity is written in C++ under a custom or non-standard licence; photoview is written in Go under AGPL-3.0. Audacity has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, photoview 7%. Audacity was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Audacity ★ 18K photoview ★ 6.5K category Miscellaneous

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

Audacity photoview
GitHub stars ★ 18K ★ 6.5K
License Custom / other AGPL-3.0
Written in C++ Go
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 2.7K ⑂ 485
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Audacity if

  • You weight community size — 18K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Audacity profile →

pick photoview if

  • You want the photoview feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and photoview fits your workflow better

full photoview profile →

About Audacity

Audacity is an open source audio editor and recorder written in C++ and distributed under free software terms. It lives in the open source desktop audio editing ecosystem, where it provides a multi track interface for recording and editing audio on Windows, macOS, GNU/Linux, and other operating systems. The README describes the project as an easy to use audio tool, and the repository contains both the Audacity 3.x line and the in progress Audacity 4 line.

read the full Audacity overview →

About photoview

Photoview is an AGPL 3.0 licensed photo and video gallery server written in Go that scans an existing folder of media on a self hosted machine and serves it as a fast, browsable website built for photographers.

read the full photoview overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

opencut vs audacity opencut vs losslesscut opencut vs shotcut opencut vs darktable opencut vs krita opencut vs openshot opencut vs gimp opencut vs kdenlive firecrawl vs godot firecrawl vs gdevelop godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs cratedb opencut vs cratedb

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

Audacity vs OpenCut Audacity vs LosslessCut Audacity vs sharp Audacity vs rembg Audacity vs filepond Audacity vs Shotcut Audacity vs ImageToolbox Audacity vs palmier-pro Audacity vs Darktable Audacity vs Krita Audacity vs TagStudio Audacity vs OpenShot

Frequently asked questions

Is Audacity or photoview more popular?

Audacity has 18,477 GitHub stars and photoview has 6,528. Audacity has the larger community by that measure.

Are Audacity and photoview free?

Both are open source. Audacity has no licence declared in this registry, and photoview is licensed under AGPL-3.0. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Audacity and photoview?

Audacity is written in C++ and photoview in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Audacity or photoview?

Choose Audacity if you want the larger community (18,477 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose photoview if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.