head to head · open source

Audacity vs photon

Audacity has 18,631 GitHub stars, 2,673 forks, 1,781 open issues and last shipped yesterday. photon has 3,897 stars, 189 forks, 49 open issues and last shipped 15 days ago. Audacity leads on adoption by 378% (18,631 vs 3,897 stars). Audacity is written in C++ under a custom or non-standard licence; photon is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. Audacity has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, photon 5%. Audacity was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Audacity ★ 19K photon ★ 3.9K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Audacity photon
GitHub stars ★ 19K ★ 3.9K
License Custom / other Apache-2.0
Written in C++ Rust
Last push 2026-10-02 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 2.7K ⑂ 189
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Audacity if

  • You weight community size — 19K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Audacity profile →

pick photon if

  • You want the photon feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and photon fits your workflow better

full photon profile →

About Audacity

Audacity is an open source audio editor and recorder written in C++ and distributed under free software terms. It lives in the open source desktop audio editing ecosystem, where it provides a multi track interface for recording and editing audio on Windows, macOS, GNU/Linux, and other operating systems. The README describes the project as an easy to use audio tool, and the repository contains both the Audacity 3.x line and the in progress Audacity 4 line.

read the full Audacity overview →

About photon

photon is an open source Rust library that compiles to WebAssembly for fast image processing in the browser, on Node, or natively, aimed at developers who need to apply image effects from their own applications.

read the full photon overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 188K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 99K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

opencut vs audacity opencut vs losslesscut opencut vs sharp opencut vs rembg opencut vs filepond opencut vs shotcut opencut vs imagetoolbox opencut vs palmier-pro firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

Audacity vs OpenCut Audacity vs LosslessCut Audacity vs sharp Audacity vs rembg Audacity vs filepond Audacity vs Shotcut Audacity vs ImageToolbox Audacity vs palmier-pro Audacity vs Darktable Audacity vs libvips Audacity vs imgproxy Audacity vs Krita

Frequently asked questions

Is Audacity or photon more popular?

Audacity has 18,631 GitHub stars and photon has 3,897. Audacity has the larger community by that measure.

Are Audacity and photon free?

Both are open source. Audacity has no licence declared in this registry, and photon is licensed under Apache-2.0. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Audacity and photon?

Audacity is written in C++ and photon in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Audacity or photon?

Choose Audacity if you want the larger community (18,631 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose photon if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.