head to head · open source

Audacity vs images

Audacity has 18,651 GitHub stars, 2,677 forks, 1,781 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. images has 2,836 stars, 247 forks, 23 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. Audacity leads on adoption by 558% (18,651 vs 2,836 stars). Audacity is written in C++ under a custom or non-standard licence; images is written in C++ under BSD-3-Clause. Audacity has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, images 9%. Audacity was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Audacity ★ 19K images ★ 2.8K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Audacity images
GitHub stars ★ 19K ★ 2.8K
License Custom / other BSD-3-Clause
Written in C++ C++
Last push 2026-10-02 2026-10-01
Forks ⑂ 2.7K ⑂ 247
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Audacity if

  • You weight community size — 19K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Audacity profile →

pick images if

  • You want the images feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the BSD-3-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You evaluated both and images fits your workflow better

full images profile →

About Audacity

Audacity is an open source audio editor and recorder written in C++ and distributed under free software terms. It lives in the open source desktop audio editing ecosystem, where it provides a multi track interface for recording and editing audio on Windows, macOS, GNU/Linux, and other operating systems. The README describes the project as an easy to use audio tool, and the repository contains both the Audacity 3.x line and the in progress Audacity 4 line.

read the full Audacity overview →

About images

wsrv.nl images is a self hostable image processing and caching server for developers who want to resize, convert, and proxy remote images from their own infrastructure instead of depending on a third party image CDN.

read the full images overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 189K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 99K manim ★ 95K

Related comparisons

opencut vs audacity opencut vs losslesscut opencut vs sharp opencut vs rembg opencut vs filepond opencut vs shotcut opencut vs imagetoolbox opencut vs palmier-pro firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

Audacity vs OpenCut Audacity vs LosslessCut Audacity vs sharp Audacity vs rembg Audacity vs filepond Audacity vs Shotcut Audacity vs ImageToolbox Audacity vs palmier-pro Audacity vs Darktable Audacity vs libvips Audacity vs imgproxy Audacity vs Krita

Frequently asked questions

Is Audacity or images more popular?

Audacity has 18,651 GitHub stars and images has 2,836. Audacity has the larger community by that measure.

Are Audacity and images free?

Both are open source. Audacity has no licence declared in this registry, and images is licensed under BSD-3-Clause. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Audacity and images?

Audacity is written in C++ and images in C++. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Audacity or images?

Choose Audacity if you want the larger community (18,651 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose images if its feature set, stack or BSD-3-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.