head to head · open source

Audacity vs exifcleaner

Audacity has 18,659 GitHub stars, 2,680 forks, 1,781 open issues and last shipped yesterday. exifcleaner has 2,721 stars, 166 forks, 26 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Audacity leads on adoption by 586% (18,659 vs 2,721 stars). Audacity is written in C++ under a custom or non-standard licence; exifcleaner is written in TypeScript under MIT. Audacity has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, exifcleaner 6%. Audacity was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Audacity ★ 19K exifcleaner ★ 2.7K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Audacity exifcleaner
GitHub stars ★ 19K ★ 2.7K
License Custom / other MIT
Written in C++ TypeScript
Last push 2026-10-06 2026-10-05
Forks ⑂ 2.7K ⑂ 166
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Audacity if

  • You weight community size — 19K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Audacity profile →

pick exifcleaner if

  • You want the exifcleaner feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and exifcleaner fits your workflow better

full exifcleaner profile →

About Audacity

Audacity is an open source audio editor and recorder written in C++ and distributed under free software terms. It lives in the open source desktop audio editing ecosystem, where it provides a multi track interface for recording and editing audio on Windows, macOS, GNU/Linux, and other operating systems. The README describes the project as an easy to use audio tool, and the repository contains both the Audacity 3.x line and the in progress Audacity 4 line.

read the full Audacity overview →

About exifcleaner

ExifCleaner is a free, cross platform desktop app for anyone who wants to strip EXIF and other metadata from images, media files, and PDFs before sharing them, without uploading anything to a third party.

read the full exifcleaner overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 189K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K open-design ★ 100K ant-design ★ 100K manim ★ 95K

Related comparisons

opencut vs audacity opencut vs losslesscut opencut vs sharp opencut vs rembg opencut vs filepond opencut vs shotcut opencut vs imagetoolbox opencut vs palmier-pro firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

Audacity vs OpenCut Audacity vs LosslessCut Audacity vs sharp Audacity vs rembg Audacity vs filepond Audacity vs Shotcut Audacity vs ImageToolbox Audacity vs palmier-pro Audacity vs Darktable Audacity vs libvips Audacity vs imgproxy Audacity vs Krita

Frequently asked questions

Is Audacity or exifcleaner more popular?

Audacity has 18,659 GitHub stars and exifcleaner has 2,721. Audacity has the larger community by that measure.

Are Audacity and exifcleaner free?

Both are open source. Audacity has no licence declared in this registry, and exifcleaner is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Audacity and exifcleaner?

Audacity is written in C++ and exifcleaner in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Audacity or exifcleaner?

Choose Audacity if you want the larger community (18,659 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose exifcleaner if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.