head to head · open source

Nuclear vs tunarr

Nuclear has 18,480 GitHub stars, 1,327 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped today. tunarr has 2,579 stars, 132 forks, 206 open issues and last shipped today. Nuclear leads on adoption by 617% (18,480 vs 2,579 stars). Nuclear is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; tunarr is written in TypeScript under Zlib. Nuclear has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, tunarr 5%. Nuclear was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Nuclear ★ 18K tunarr ★ 2.6K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Nuclear tunarr
GitHub stars ★ 18K ★ 2.6K
License AGPL-3.0 Zlib
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-20
Forks ⑂ 1.3K ⑂ 132
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Nuclear if

  • You weight community size — 18K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Nuclear profile →

pick tunarr if

  • You want the tunarr feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Zlib license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and tunarr fits your workflow better

full tunarr profile →

About Nuclear

Nuclear is a free, open source music player for Windows, macOS, and Linux that streams music from multiple sources without ads or tracking. The project lives in the desktop music player ecosystem and is written primarily in TypeScript, with a Tauri application built from Rust and React. It is distributed under the AGPL 3.0 license.

read the full Nuclear overview →

About tunarr

Tunarr is a self hosted media streaming project written in TypeScript and released under the Zlib license. It creates custom live TV channels from existing media libraries, including Plex, Jellyfin, Emby, and local files. The project lives in the self hosted IPTV and local media streaming ecosystem, where users want their media servers and media players to present a broadcast style channel lineup.

read the full tunarr overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

jellyfin vs nuclear jellyfin vs invidious jellyfin vs navidrome jellyfin vs neko jellyfin vs kodi jellyfin vs peertube jellyfin vs iptv-sources jellyfin vs ansible-nas firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Media & Streaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Media & Streaming field.

Nuclear vs Jellyfin Nuclear vs Invidious Nuclear vs Navidrome Nuclear vs neko Nuclear vs Kodi Nuclear vs PeerTube Nuclear vs iptv-sources Nuclear vs ansible-nas Nuclear vs Anthias Nuclear vs tvheadend Nuclear vs Ghosten-Player Nuclear vs BookWyrm

Frequently asked questions

Is Nuclear or tunarr more popular?

Nuclear has 18,480 GitHub stars and tunarr has 2,579. Nuclear has the larger community by that measure.

Are Nuclear and tunarr free?

Both are open source. Nuclear is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and tunarr under Zlib. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Nuclear and tunarr?

Nuclear is written in TypeScript and tunarr in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Nuclear or tunarr?

Choose Nuclear if you want the larger community (18,480 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose tunarr if its feature set, stack or Zlib licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.