head to head · open source

Nuclear vs tvheadend

Nuclear has 18,480 GitHub stars, 1,327 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped today. tvheadend has 3,524 stars, 975 forks, 107 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. Nuclear leads on adoption by 424% (18,480 vs 3,524 stars). Nuclear is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; tvheadend is written in C under GPL-3.0. Nuclear has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, tvheadend 28%. Nuclear was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Nuclear ★ 18K tvheadend ★ 3.5K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Nuclear tvheadend
GitHub stars ★ 18K ★ 3.5K
License AGPL-3.0 GPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript C
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-14
Forks ⑂ 1.3K ⑂ 975
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Nuclear if

  • You weight community size — 18K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Nuclear profile →

pick tvheadend if

  • You want the tvheadend feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You evaluated both and tvheadend fits your workflow better

full tvheadend profile →

About Nuclear

Nuclear is a free, open source music player for Windows, macOS, and Linux that streams music from multiple sources without ads or tracking. The project lives in the desktop music player ecosystem and is written primarily in TypeScript, with a Tauri application built from Rust and React. It is distributed under the AGPL 3.0 license.

read the full Nuclear overview →

About tvheadend

Tvheadend is an open source TV streaming server and digital video recorder for Linux. It lives in the Linux media and streaming ecosystem, and it is written in C under the GPL 3.0 license. The project provides a server that can receive television signals and streams from many input types, then make those channels available over the network.

read the full tvheadend overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

jellyfin vs nuclear jellyfin vs invidious jellyfin vs navidrome jellyfin vs neko jellyfin vs kodi jellyfin vs peertube jellyfin vs iptv-sources jellyfin vs ansible-nas firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Media & Streaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Media & Streaming field.

Nuclear vs Jellyfin Nuclear vs Invidious Nuclear vs Navidrome Nuclear vs neko Nuclear vs Kodi Nuclear vs PeerTube Nuclear vs iptv-sources Nuclear vs ansible-nas Nuclear vs Anthias Nuclear vs Ghosten-Player Nuclear vs BookWyrm Nuclear vs mytv-android

Frequently asked questions

Is Nuclear or tvheadend more popular?

Nuclear has 18,480 GitHub stars and tvheadend has 3,524. Nuclear has the larger community by that measure.

Are Nuclear and tvheadend free?

Both are open source. Nuclear is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and tvheadend under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Nuclear and tvheadend?

Nuclear is written in TypeScript and tvheadend in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Nuclear or tvheadend?

Choose Nuclear if you want the larger community (18,480 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose tvheadend if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.