head to head · open source

Invidious vs Nuclear

Invidious has 24,555 GitHub stars, 2,761 forks, 480 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Nuclear has 18,480 stars, 1,327 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped today. Invidious leads on adoption by 33% (24,555 vs 18,480 stars). Invidious is written in Crystal under AGPL-3.0; Nuclear is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. Invidious has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, Nuclear 7%. Nuclear was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Invidious ★ 25K Nuclear ★ 18K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Invidious Nuclear
GitHub stars ★ 25K ★ 18K
License AGPL-3.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in Crystal TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-20
Forks ⑂ 2.8K ⑂ 1.3K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Invidious if

  • You weight community size — 25K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Crystal
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Invidious profile →

pick Nuclear if

  • You want the Nuclear feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Nuclear fits your workflow better

full Nuclear profile →

About Invidious

Invidious is an open source, AGPL 3.0 alternative front end to YouTube, written in Crystal, aimed at people who want to watch videos without ads, tracking, or a Google account.

read the full Invidious overview →

About Nuclear

Nuclear is a free, open source music player for Windows, macOS, and Linux that streams music from multiple sources without ads or tracking. The project lives in the desktop music player ecosystem and is written primarily in TypeScript, with a Tauri application built from Rust and React. It is distributed under the AGPL 3.0 license.

read the full Nuclear overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

jellyfin vs invidious jellyfin vs nuclear jellyfin vs navidrome jellyfin vs neko jellyfin vs kodi jellyfin vs peertube jellyfin vs iptv-sources jellyfin vs ansible-nas firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Media & Streaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Media & Streaming field.

Invidious vs Jellyfin Invidious vs Navidrome Invidious vs neko Invidious vs Kodi Invidious vs PeerTube Invidious vs iptv-sources Invidious vs ansible-nas Invidious vs Anthias Invidious vs tvheadend Invidious vs Ghosten-Player Invidious vs BookWyrm Invidious vs mytv-android

Frequently asked questions

Is Invidious or Nuclear more popular?

Invidious has 24,555 GitHub stars and Nuclear has 18,480. Invidious has the larger community by that measure.

Are Invidious and Nuclear free?

Both are open source. Invidious is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Nuclear under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Invidious and Nuclear?

Invidious is written in Crystal and Nuclear in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Invidious or Nuclear?

Choose Invidious if you want the larger community (24,555 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Nuclear if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.