head to head · open source

Nuclear vs PeerTube

Nuclear has 18,480 GitHub stars, 1,327 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped today. PeerTube has 15,322 stars, 1,848 forks, 692 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Nuclear leads on adoption by 21% (18,480 vs 15,322 stars). Nuclear is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; PeerTube is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. Nuclear has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, PeerTube 12%. Nuclear was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Nuclear ★ 18K PeerTube ★ 15K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Nuclear PeerTube
GitHub stars ★ 18K ★ 15K
License AGPL-3.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 1.3K ⑂ 1.8K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Nuclear if

  • You weight community size — 18K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Nuclear profile →

pick PeerTube if

  • You want the PeerTube feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and PeerTube fits your workflow better

full PeerTube profile →

About Nuclear

Nuclear is a free, open source music player for Windows, macOS, and Linux that streams music from multiple sources without ads or tracking. The project lives in the desktop music player ecosystem and is written primarily in TypeScript, with a Tauri application built from Rust and React. It is distributed under the AGPL 3.0 license.

read the full Nuclear overview →

About PeerTube

PeerTube is free, decentralized, federated video platform. It uses ActivityPub federation, browser P2P, TypeScript codebase, AGPL 3.0 license. Project sits in open source media streaming and Fediverse ecosystem. Framasoft developed it as alternative to centralized video platforms such as YouTube, Dailymotion, and Vimeo.

read the full PeerTube overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

jellyfin vs nuclear jellyfin vs peertube jellyfin vs invidious jellyfin vs navidrome jellyfin vs neko jellyfin vs kodi jellyfin vs iptv-sources jellyfin vs ansible-nas firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Media & Streaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Media & Streaming field.

Nuclear vs Jellyfin Nuclear vs Invidious Nuclear vs Navidrome Nuclear vs neko Nuclear vs Kodi Nuclear vs iptv-sources Nuclear vs ansible-nas Nuclear vs Anthias Nuclear vs tvheadend Nuclear vs Ghosten-Player Nuclear vs BookWyrm Nuclear vs mytv-android

Frequently asked questions

Is Nuclear or PeerTube more popular?

Nuclear has 18,480 GitHub stars and PeerTube has 15,322. Nuclear has the larger community by that measure.

Are Nuclear and PeerTube free?

Both are open source. Nuclear is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and PeerTube under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Nuclear and PeerTube?

Nuclear is written in TypeScript and PeerTube in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Nuclear or PeerTube?

Choose Nuclear if you want the larger community (18,480 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose PeerTube if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.