head to head · open source

three.js vs Sigle

three.js has 115,666 GitHub stars, 36,556 forks, 386 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Sigle has 490 stars, 82 forks, 22 open issues and last shipped 29 days ago. three.js leads on adoption by 23,505% (115,666 vs 490 stars). three.js is written in JavaScript under MIT; Sigle is written in TypeScript under MIT. three.js has attracted 32% as many forks as stars, Sigle 17%. three.js was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

three.js ★ 116K Sigle ★ 490 category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

three.js Sigle
GitHub stars ★ 116K ★ 490
License MIT MIT
Written in JavaScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-08-22
Forks ⑂ 37K ⑂ 82
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick three.js if

  • You weight community size — 116K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full three.js profile →

pick Sigle if

  • You want the Sigle feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Sigle fits your workflow better

full Sigle profile →

About three.js

three.js is an MIT licensed JavaScript 3D library that provides an easy to use, lightweight, cross browser, general purpose layer for rendering interactive 3D graphics in the browser, aimed at JavaScript developers who need 3D scenes on the web without writing raw GPU code.

read the full three.js overview →

About Sigle

Sigle is an open source writing platform built for Web3 content creators. It is written in TypeScript under the MIT license, and its stated audience is broad within that niche: Web3 writers, NFT projects, and crypto analysts. The project presents itself as a secured publishing environment where creators can shape a community around their work and bring their stories to life. Its homepage lives at sigle.io, and the repository is tagged with topics including blogging, open source, Sigle, Stacks, and TypeScript.

read the full Sigle overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K Home Assistant ★ 91K

Related comparisons

godot vs three-js three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sigle three-js vs hey three-js vs octobot three-js vs home-assistant three-js vs fleetbase firecrawl vs godot firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs hey firecrawl vs octobot godot vs hey godot vs octobot home-assistant vs hey firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap

More Gaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Gaming field.

three.js vs Godot three.js vs imgui three.js vs bevy three.js vs raylib three.js vs GDevelop three.js vs Babylon.js three.js vs libgdx three.js vs MonoGame three.js vs Pumpkin three.js vs azerothcore-wotlk three.js vs zinx three.js vs colyseus

Frequently asked questions

Is three.js or Sigle more popular?

three.js has 115,666 GitHub stars and Sigle has 490. three.js has the larger community by that measure.

Are three.js and Sigle free?

Both are open source. three.js is licensed under MIT and Sigle under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between three.js and Sigle?

three.js is written in JavaScript and Sigle in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, three.js or Sigle?

Choose three.js if you want the larger community (115,666 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Sigle if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.