head to head · open source
three.js vs CrateDB
three.js has 115,666 GitHub stars, 36,556 forks, 386 open issues and last shipped yesterday. CrateDB has 4,436 stars, 617 forks, 332 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. three.js leads on adoption by 2,507% (115,666 vs 4,436 stars). three.js is written in JavaScript under MIT; CrateDB is written in Java under Apache-2.0. three.js has attracted 32% as many forks as stars, CrateDB 14%. three.js was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| three.js | CrateDB | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 116K | ★ 4.4K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | Java |
| Last push | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-18 |
| Forks | ⑂ 37K | ⑂ 617 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick three.js if
- You weight community size — 116K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick CrateDB if
- You want the CrateDB feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You evaluated both and CrateDB fits your workflow better
About three.js
three.js is an MIT licensed JavaScript 3D library that provides an easy to use, lightweight, cross browser, general purpose layer for rendering interactive 3D graphics in the browser, aimed at JavaScript developers who need 3D scenes on the web without writing raw GPU code.
read the full three.js overview →
About CrateDB
CrateDB is a distributed, scalable SQL database built for storing and analyzing massive amounts of data in near real time, including complex queries. It is written in Java, licensed under Apache 2.0, and based on Lucene. The project combines the benefits of an SQL database with the scalability and flexibility typically associated with NoSQL databases, and it is PostgreSQL compatible, speaking the PostgreSQL wire protocol as well as offering an HTTP API. It lives in the analytics, big data, and IoT ecosystem, and the topic list places it alongside distributed SQL databases, Elasticsearch, industrial IoT, and IoT a…
read the full CrateDB overview →
More in Miscellaneous
Related comparisons
More Gaming projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Gaming field.
Frequently asked questions
Is three.js or CrateDB more popular?
three.js has 115,666 GitHub stars and CrateDB has 4,436. three.js has the larger community by that measure.
Are three.js and CrateDB free?
Both are open source. three.js is licensed under MIT and CrateDB under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between three.js and CrateDB?
three.js is written in JavaScript and CrateDB in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, three.js or CrateDB?
Choose three.js if you want the larger community (115,666 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose CrateDB if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.