head to head · open source

sharp vs postprocessing

sharp has 32,741 GitHub stars, 1,439 forks, 123 open issues and last shipped yesterday. postprocessing has 2,874 stars, 251 forks, 30 open issues and last shipped yesterday. sharp leads on adoption by 1,039% (32,741 vs 2,874 stars). sharp is written in JavaScript under Apache-2.0; postprocessing is written in JavaScript under Zlib. sharp has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, postprocessing 9%. postprocessing was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (image-processing), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

sharp ★ 33K postprocessing ★ 2.9K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

sharp postprocessing
GitHub stars ★ 33K ★ 2.9K
License Apache-2.0 Zlib
Written in JavaScript JavaScript
Last push 2026-10-04 2026-10-04
Forks ⑂ 1.4K ⑂ 251
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick sharp if

  • You weight community size — 33K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full sharp profile →

pick postprocessing if

  • You want the postprocessing feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Zlib license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and postprocessing fits your workflow better

full postprocessing profile →

About sharp

sharp is a high performance Node.js image processing library that converts large images in common formats into smaller, web friendly JPEG, PNG, WebP, GIF and AVIF files, and it is built for JavaScript developers who need fast, dependency light resizing inside Node.js, Deno or Bun applications.

read the full sharp overview →

About postprocessing

Postprocessing is a JavaScript post processing library for three.js that gives WebGL developers a passes and effects pipeline for applying fullscreen image effects to a rendered scene in real time.

read the full postprocessing overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 189K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 99K manim ★ 95K

Related comparisons

opencut vs sharp opencut vs losslesscut opencut vs rembg opencut vs audacity opencut vs filepond opencut vs shotcut opencut vs imagetoolbox opencut vs palmier-pro firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

sharp vs OpenCut sharp vs LosslessCut sharp vs rembg sharp vs Audacity sharp vs filepond sharp vs Shotcut sharp vs ImageToolbox sharp vs palmier-pro sharp vs Darktable sharp vs libvips sharp vs imgproxy sharp vs Krita

Frequently asked questions

Is sharp or postprocessing more popular?

sharp has 32,741 GitHub stars and postprocessing has 2,874. sharp has the larger community by that measure.

Are sharp and postprocessing free?

Both are open source. sharp is licensed under Apache-2.0 and postprocessing under Zlib. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between sharp and postprocessing?

sharp is written in JavaScript and postprocessing in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, sharp or postprocessing?

Choose sharp if you want the larger community (32,741 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose postprocessing if its feature set, stack or Zlib licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.