head to head · open source

sharp vs photon

sharp has 32,735 GitHub stars, 1,440 forks, 123 open issues and last shipped yesterday. photon has 3,897 stars, 189 forks, 49 open issues and last shipped 15 days ago. sharp leads on adoption by 740% (32,735 vs 3,897 stars). sharp is written in JavaScript under Apache-2.0; photon is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. sharp has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, photon 5%. sharp was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (image-processing), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

sharp ★ 33K photon ★ 3.9K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

sharp photon
GitHub stars ★ 33K ★ 3.9K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in JavaScript Rust
Last push 2026-10-02 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 1.4K ⑂ 189
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick sharp if

  • You weight community size — 33K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full sharp profile →

pick photon if

  • You want the photon feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and photon fits your workflow better

full photon profile →

About sharp

sharp is a high performance Node.js image processing library that converts large images in common formats into smaller, web friendly JPEG, PNG, WebP, GIF and AVIF files, and it is built for JavaScript developers who need fast, dependency light resizing inside Node.js, Deno or Bun applications.

read the full sharp overview →

About photon

photon is an open source Rust library that compiles to WebAssembly for fast image processing in the browser, on Node, or natively, aimed at developers who need to apply image effects from their own applications.

read the full photon overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 188K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 99K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

opencut vs sharp opencut vs losslesscut opencut vs rembg opencut vs audacity opencut vs filepond opencut vs shotcut opencut vs imagetoolbox opencut vs palmier-pro firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

sharp vs OpenCut sharp vs LosslessCut sharp vs rembg sharp vs Audacity sharp vs filepond sharp vs Shotcut sharp vs ImageToolbox sharp vs palmier-pro sharp vs Darktable sharp vs libvips sharp vs imgproxy sharp vs Krita

Frequently asked questions

Is sharp or photon more popular?

sharp has 32,735 GitHub stars and photon has 3,897. sharp has the larger community by that measure.

Are sharp and photon free?

Both are open source. sharp is licensed under Apache-2.0 and photon under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between sharp and photon?

sharp is written in JavaScript and photon in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, sharp or photon?

Choose sharp if you want the larger community (32,735 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose photon if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.