head to head · open source

sharp vs PermissionsKit

sharp has 32,692 GitHub stars, 1,436 forks, 123 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. PermissionsKit has 5,811 stars, 481 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped 7 days ago. sharp leads on adoption by 463% (32,692 vs 5,811 stars). sharp is written in JavaScript under Apache-2.0; PermissionsKit is written in Swift under MIT. sharp has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, PermissionsKit 8%. sharp was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

sharp ★ 33K PermissionsKit ★ 5.8K category Miscellaneous

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

sharp PermissionsKit
GitHub stars ★ 33K ★ 5.8K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in JavaScript Swift
Last push 2026-09-13 2026-09-12
Forks ⑂ 1.4K ⑂ 481
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick sharp if

  • You weight community size — 33K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full sharp profile →

pick PermissionsKit if

  • You want the PermissionsKit feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Swift
  • You evaluated both and PermissionsKit fits your workflow better

full PermissionsKit profile →

About sharp

sharp is a high performance Node.js image processing library that converts large images in common formats into smaller, web friendly JPEG, PNG, WebP, GIF and AVIF files, and it is built for JavaScript developers who need fast, dependency light resizing inside Node.js, Deno or Bun applications.

read the full sharp overview →

About PermissionsKit

PermissionsKit is a Swift package that gives apps one universal API for requesting system permissions and reading their status — .authorized , .denied , .notDetermined — aimed at Apple platform developers who want to link only the permission products their app actually uses.

read the full PermissionsKit overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

opencut vs losslesscut opencut vs audacity opencut vs shotcut opencut vs darktable opencut vs krita opencut vs openshot opencut vs gimp opencut vs kdenlive firecrawl vs godot firecrawl vs gdevelop godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs cratedb opencut vs cratedb

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

sharp vs OpenCut sharp vs LosslessCut sharp vs rembg sharp vs Audacity sharp vs filepond sharp vs Shotcut sharp vs ImageToolbox sharp vs palmier-pro sharp vs Darktable sharp vs Krita sharp vs TagStudio sharp vs photoview

Frequently asked questions

Is sharp or PermissionsKit more popular?

sharp has 32,692 GitHub stars and PermissionsKit has 5,811. sharp has the larger community by that measure.

Are sharp and PermissionsKit free?

Both are open source. sharp is licensed under Apache-2.0 and PermissionsKit under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between sharp and PermissionsKit?

sharp is written in JavaScript and PermissionsKit in Swift. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, sharp or PermissionsKit?

Choose sharp if you want the larger community (32,692 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose PermissionsKit if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.