head to head · open source

sharp vs images

sharp has 32,741 GitHub stars, 1,439 forks, 123 open issues and last shipped yesterday. images has 2,836 stars, 247 forks, 23 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. sharp leads on adoption by 1,054% (32,741 vs 2,836 stars). sharp is written in JavaScript under Apache-2.0; images is written in C++ under BSD-3-Clause. sharp has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, images 9%. sharp was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (image-processing, libvips), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

sharp ★ 33K images ★ 2.8K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

sharp images
GitHub stars ★ 33K ★ 2.8K
License Apache-2.0 BSD-3-Clause
Written in JavaScript C++
Last push 2026-10-04 2026-10-01
Forks ⑂ 1.4K ⑂ 247
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick sharp if

  • You weight community size — 33K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full sharp profile →

pick images if

  • You want the images feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the BSD-3-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You evaluated both and images fits your workflow better

full images profile →

About sharp

sharp is a high performance Node.js image processing library that converts large images in common formats into smaller, web friendly JPEG, PNG, WebP, GIF and AVIF files, and it is built for JavaScript developers who need fast, dependency light resizing inside Node.js, Deno or Bun applications.

read the full sharp overview →

About images

wsrv.nl images is a self hostable image processing and caching server for developers who want to resize, convert, and proxy remote images from their own infrastructure instead of depending on a third party image CDN.

read the full images overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 189K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 99K manim ★ 95K

Related comparisons

opencut vs sharp opencut vs losslesscut opencut vs rembg opencut vs audacity opencut vs filepond opencut vs shotcut opencut vs imagetoolbox opencut vs palmier-pro firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

sharp vs OpenCut sharp vs LosslessCut sharp vs rembg sharp vs Audacity sharp vs filepond sharp vs Shotcut sharp vs ImageToolbox sharp vs palmier-pro sharp vs Darktable sharp vs libvips sharp vs imgproxy sharp vs Krita

Frequently asked questions

Is sharp or images more popular?

sharp has 32,741 GitHub stars and images has 2,836. sharp has the larger community by that measure.

Are sharp and images free?

Both are open source. sharp is licensed under Apache-2.0 and images under BSD-3-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between sharp and images?

sharp is written in JavaScript and images in C++. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, sharp or images?

Choose sharp if you want the larger community (32,741 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose images if its feature set, stack or BSD-3-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.