head to head · open source

sharp vs GIMP

sharp has 32,695 GitHub stars, 1,437 forks, 123 open issues and last shipped yesterday. GIMP has 6,437 stars, 890 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped yesterday. sharp leads on adoption by 408% (32,695 vs 6,437 stars). sharp is written in JavaScript under Apache-2.0; GIMP is written in C under a custom or non-standard licence. sharp has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, GIMP 14%. GIMP was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

sharp ★ 33K GIMP ★ 6.4K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

sharp GIMP
GitHub stars ★ 33K ★ 6.4K
License Apache-2.0 Custom / other
Written in JavaScript C
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 1.4K ⑂ 890
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick sharp if

  • You weight community size — 33K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full sharp profile →

pick GIMP if

  • You want the GIMP feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You evaluated both and GIMP fits your workflow better

full GIMP profile →

About sharp

sharp is a high performance Node.js image processing library that converts large images in common formats into smaller, web friendly JPEG, PNG, WebP, GIF and AVIF files, and it is built for JavaScript developers who need fast, dependency light resizing inside Node.js, Deno or Bun applications.

read the full sharp overview →

About GIMP

GIMP (GNU Image Manipulation Program) is a free, open source raster image editor aimed at photographers, designers, and illustrators who need professional grade editing tools without a commercial licence, and it is positioned in this registry as the open alternative to Adobe Photoshop.

read the full GIMP overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

opencut vs sharp opencut vs losslesscut opencut vs rembg opencut vs audacity opencut vs filepond opencut vs shotcut opencut vs imagetoolbox opencut vs palmier-pro firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

sharp vs OpenCut sharp vs LosslessCut sharp vs rembg sharp vs Audacity sharp vs filepond sharp vs Shotcut sharp vs ImageToolbox sharp vs palmier-pro sharp vs Darktable sharp vs libvips sharp vs imgproxy sharp vs Krita

Frequently asked questions

Is sharp or GIMP more popular?

sharp has 32,695 GitHub stars and GIMP has 6,437. sharp has the larger community by that measure.

Are sharp and GIMP free?

Both are open source. sharp is licensed under Apache-2.0, and GIMP has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between sharp and GIMP?

sharp is written in JavaScript and GIMP in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, sharp or GIMP?

Choose sharp if you want the larger community (32,695 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose GIMP if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.