head to head · open source

sharp vs freecut

sharp has 32,695 GitHub stars, 1,437 forks, 123 open issues and last shipped yesterday. freecut has 2,186 stars, 341 forks, 12 open issues and last shipped 20 days ago. sharp leads on adoption by 1,396% (32,695 vs 2,186 stars). sharp is written in JavaScript under Apache-2.0; freecut is written in TypeScript under MIT. sharp has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, freecut 16%. sharp was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

sharp ★ 33K freecut ★ 2.2K category Miscellaneous

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

sharp freecut
GitHub stars ★ 33K ★ 2.2K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in JavaScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-08-31
Forks ⑂ 1.4K ⑂ 341
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick sharp if

  • You weight community size — 33K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full sharp profile →

pick freecut if

  • You want the freecut feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and freecut fits your workflow better

full freecut profile →

About sharp

sharp is a high performance Node.js image processing library that converts large images in common formats into smaller, web friendly JPEG, PNG, WebP, GIF and AVIF files, and it is built for JavaScript developers who need fast, dependency light resizing inside Node.js, Deno or Bun applications.

read the full sharp overview →

About freecut

FreeCut is an MIT licensed, browser based multi track video editor written in TypeScript for editors who want professional timeline, compositing, and export tools without installing desktop software or uploading media to a server.

read the full freecut overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

opencut vs losslesscut opencut vs audacity opencut vs shotcut opencut vs darktable opencut vs krita opencut vs openshot opencut vs gimp opencut vs kdenlive firecrawl vs godot firecrawl vs gdevelop godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs cratedb opencut vs cratedb

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

sharp vs OpenCut sharp vs LosslessCut sharp vs rembg sharp vs Audacity sharp vs filepond sharp vs Shotcut sharp vs ImageToolbox sharp vs palmier-pro sharp vs Darktable sharp vs libvips sharp vs imgproxy sharp vs Krita

Frequently asked questions

Is sharp or freecut more popular?

sharp has 32,695 GitHub stars and freecut has 2,186. sharp has the larger community by that measure.

Are sharp and freecut free?

Both are open source. sharp is licensed under Apache-2.0 and freecut under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between sharp and freecut?

sharp is written in JavaScript and freecut in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, sharp or freecut?

Choose sharp if you want the larger community (32,695 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose freecut if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.