head to head · open source
sharp vs Clypra
sharp has 32,817 GitHub stars, 1,447 forks, 123 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. Clypra has 3,347 stars, 338 forks, 20 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. sharp leads on adoption by 880% (32,817 vs 3,347 stars). sharp is written in JavaScript under Apache-2.0; Clypra is written in TypeScript under MIT. sharp has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, Clypra 10%. Clypra was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| sharp | Clypra | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 33K | ★ 3.3K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-10-29 | 2026-11-01 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.4K | ⑂ 338 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick sharp if
- You weight community size — 33K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Clypra if
- You want the Clypra feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and Clypra fits your workflow better
About sharp
sharp The typical use case for this high speed Node API module is to convert large images in common formats to smaller, web friendly JPEG, PNG, WebP, GIF and AVIF images of varying dimensions. It can be used with all JavaScript runtimes that provide support for Node API v9, including Node.js ( = 20.9.0), Deno and Bun. Resizing an image is typically 4x 5x faster than using the quickest ImageMagick and GraphicsMagick settings due to its use of libvips. Colour spaces, embedded ICC profiles and alpha transparency channels are all handled correctly. Lanczos resampling ensures quality is not sacrificed for speed. As…
read the full sharp overview →
About Clypra
Clypra Professional video editing—free and open source forever. A hardware accelerated video editor built on Rust, Tauri v2, and React 19. Sub 10ms frame decoding, GPU native rendering, and a frame accurate timeline — all free and open source under MIT. Features • Architecture • ⚡ Performance Telemetry • Installation • Development • Contributing Overview Clypra is a free, open source video editor (MIT License) with professional grade features. Everything is 100% free and open source—no watermarks, no paywalls, no feature limits, and no subscriptions required. Supported Platforms Desktop : macOS (Apple Silicon &…
read the full Clypra overview →
More in Miscellaneous
Related comparisons
More Photo & Video Editors projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.
Frequently asked questions
Is sharp or Clypra more popular?
sharp has 32,817 GitHub stars and Clypra has 3,347. sharp has the larger community by that measure.
Are sharp and Clypra free?
Both are open source. sharp is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Clypra under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between sharp and Clypra?
sharp is written in JavaScript and Clypra in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, sharp or Clypra?
Choose sharp if you want the larger community (32,817 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Clypra if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.