head to head · open source

sharp vs basis_universal

sharp has 32,741 GitHub stars, 1,439 forks, 123 open issues and last shipped yesterday. basis_universal has 3,116 stars, 347 forks, 128 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. sharp leads on adoption by 951% (32,741 vs 3,116 stars). sharp is written in JavaScript under Apache-2.0; basis_universal is written in C++ under Apache-2.0. sharp has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, basis_universal 11%. sharp was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (image-processing, jpeg, png), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

sharp ★ 33K basis_universal ★ 3.1K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

sharp basis_universal
GitHub stars ★ 33K ★ 3.1K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in JavaScript C++
Last push 2026-10-04 2026-09-01
Forks ⑂ 1.4K ⑂ 347
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick sharp if

  • You weight community size — 33K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full sharp profile →

pick basis_universal if

  • You want the basis_universal feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You evaluated both and basis_universal fits your workflow better

full basis_universal profile →

About sharp

sharp is a high performance Node.js image processing library that converts large images in common formats into smaller, web friendly JPEG, PNG, WebP, GIF and AVIF files, and it is built for JavaScript developers who need fast, dependency light resizing inside Node.js, Deno or Bun applications.

read the full sharp overview →

About basis_universal

Basis Universal is an open source C++ GPU texture codec system that lets developers encode images, HDR content, and short animations once into a supercompressed interchange file and transcode them on demand to nearly any GPU texture format.

read the full basis_universal overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 189K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 99K manim ★ 95K

Related comparisons

opencut vs sharp opencut vs losslesscut opencut vs rembg opencut vs audacity opencut vs filepond opencut vs shotcut opencut vs imagetoolbox opencut vs palmier-pro firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

sharp vs OpenCut sharp vs LosslessCut sharp vs rembg sharp vs Audacity sharp vs filepond sharp vs Shotcut sharp vs ImageToolbox sharp vs palmier-pro sharp vs Darktable sharp vs libvips sharp vs imgproxy sharp vs Krita

Frequently asked questions

Is sharp or basis_universal more popular?

sharp has 32,741 GitHub stars and basis_universal has 3,116. sharp has the larger community by that measure.

Are sharp and basis_universal free?

Both are open source. sharp is licensed under Apache-2.0 and basis_universal under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between sharp and basis_universal?

sharp is written in JavaScript and basis_universal in C++. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, sharp or basis_universal?

Choose sharp if you want the larger community (32,741 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose basis_universal if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.