head to head · open source

rembg vs PermissionsKit

rembg has 24,796 GitHub stars, 2,423 forks, 3 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. PermissionsKit has 5,811 stars, 481 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped 7 days ago. rembg leads on adoption by 327% (24,796 vs 5,811 stars). rembg is written in Python under MIT; PermissionsKit is written in Swift under MIT. rembg has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, PermissionsKit 8%. PermissionsKit was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

rembg ★ 25K PermissionsKit ★ 5.8K category Miscellaneous

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

rembg PermissionsKit
GitHub stars ★ 25K ★ 5.8K
License MIT MIT
Written in Python Swift
Last push 2026-09-08 2026-09-12
Forks ⑂ 2.4K ⑂ 481
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick rembg if

  • You weight community size — 25K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full rembg profile →

pick PermissionsKit if

  • You want the PermissionsKit feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Swift
  • You evaluated both and PermissionsKit fits your workflow better

full PermissionsKit profile →

About rembg

Rembg is an MIT licensed Python tool for removing image backgrounds, usable as a CLI, a Python library, an HTTP server, or a Docker container, and aimed at developers, designers, and automated image pipelines that need background removal without depending on a hosted service.

read the full rembg overview →

About PermissionsKit

PermissionsKit is a Swift package that gives apps one universal API for requesting system permissions and reading their status — .authorized , .denied , .notDetermined — aimed at Apple platform developers who want to link only the permission products their app actually uses.

read the full PermissionsKit overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

opencut vs losslesscut opencut vs audacity opencut vs shotcut opencut vs darktable opencut vs krita opencut vs openshot opencut vs gimp opencut vs kdenlive firecrawl vs godot firecrawl vs gdevelop godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs cratedb opencut vs cratedb

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

rembg vs OpenCut rembg vs LosslessCut rembg vs sharp rembg vs Audacity rembg vs filepond rembg vs Shotcut rembg vs ImageToolbox rembg vs palmier-pro rembg vs Darktable rembg vs Krita rembg vs TagStudio rembg vs photoview

Frequently asked questions

Is rembg or PermissionsKit more popular?

rembg has 24,796 GitHub stars and PermissionsKit has 5,811. rembg has the larger community by that measure.

Are rembg and PermissionsKit free?

Both are open source. rembg is licensed under MIT and PermissionsKit under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between rembg and PermissionsKit?

rembg is written in Python and PermissionsKit in Swift. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, rembg or PermissionsKit?

Choose rembg if you want the larger community (24,796 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose PermissionsKit if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.