head to head · open source

rembg vs imagor

rembg has 24,936 GitHub stars, 2,427 forks, 3 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. imagor has 4,026 stars, 176 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped 7 days ago. rembg leads on adoption by 519% (24,936 vs 4,026 stars). rembg is written in Python under MIT; imagor is written in Go under Apache-2.0. rembg has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, imagor 4%. imagor was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (image-processing), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

rembg ★ 25K imagor ★ 4.0K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

rembg imagor
GitHub stars ★ 25K ★ 4.0K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in Python Go
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-24
Forks ⑂ 2.4K ⑂ 176
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick rembg if

  • You weight community size — 25K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full rembg profile →

pick imagor if

  • You want the imagor feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and imagor fits your workflow better

full imagor profile →

About rembg

Rembg is an MIT licensed Python tool for removing image backgrounds, usable as a CLI, a Python library, an HTTP server, or a Docker container, and aimed at developers, designers, and automated image pipelines that need background removal without depending on a hosted service.

read the full rembg overview →

About imagor

imagor is a fast, secure image processing server and Go library built on libvips, intended for developers who need on demand image resizing, formatting, and filtering over HTTP or as an embedded Go package.

read the full imagor overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 187K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 99K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

opencut vs rembg opencut vs losslesscut opencut vs sharp opencut vs audacity opencut vs filepond opencut vs shotcut opencut vs imagetoolbox opencut vs palmier-pro firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

rembg vs OpenCut rembg vs LosslessCut rembg vs sharp rembg vs Audacity rembg vs filepond rembg vs Shotcut rembg vs ImageToolbox rembg vs palmier-pro rembg vs Darktable rembg vs libvips rembg vs imgproxy rembg vs Krita

Frequently asked questions

Is rembg or imagor more popular?

rembg has 24,936 GitHub stars and imagor has 4,026. rembg has the larger community by that measure.

Are rembg and imagor free?

Both are open source. rembg is licensed under MIT and imagor under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between rembg and imagor?

rembg is written in Python and imagor in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, rembg or imagor?

Choose rembg if you want the larger community (24,936 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose imagor if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.