head to head · open source

rembg vs GIMP

rembg has 24,813 GitHub stars, 2,422 forks, 3 open issues and last shipped 12 days ago. GIMP has 6,437 stars, 890 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped yesterday. rembg leads on adoption by 285% (24,813 vs 6,437 stars). rembg is written in Python under MIT; GIMP is written in C under a custom or non-standard licence. rembg has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, GIMP 14%. GIMP was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

rembg ★ 25K GIMP ★ 6.4K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

rembg GIMP
GitHub stars ★ 25K ★ 6.4K
License MIT Custom / other
Written in Python C
Last push 2026-09-08 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 2.4K ⑂ 890
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick rembg if

  • You weight community size — 25K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full rembg profile →

pick GIMP if

  • You want the GIMP feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You evaluated both and GIMP fits your workflow better

full GIMP profile →

About rembg

Rembg is an MIT licensed Python tool for removing image backgrounds, usable as a CLI, a Python library, an HTTP server, or a Docker container, and aimed at developers, designers, and automated image pipelines that need background removal without depending on a hosted service.

read the full rembg overview →

About GIMP

GIMP (GNU Image Manipulation Program) is a free, open source raster image editor aimed at photographers, designers, and illustrators who need professional grade editing tools without a commercial licence, and it is positioned in this registry as the open alternative to Adobe Photoshop.

read the full GIMP overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

opencut vs rembg opencut vs losslesscut opencut vs sharp opencut vs audacity opencut vs filepond opencut vs shotcut opencut vs imagetoolbox opencut vs palmier-pro firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

rembg vs OpenCut rembg vs LosslessCut rembg vs sharp rembg vs Audacity rembg vs filepond rembg vs Shotcut rembg vs ImageToolbox rembg vs palmier-pro rembg vs Darktable rembg vs libvips rembg vs imgproxy rembg vs Krita

Frequently asked questions

Is rembg or GIMP more popular?

rembg has 24,813 GitHub stars and GIMP has 6,437. rembg has the larger community by that measure.

Are rembg and GIMP free?

Both are open source. rembg is licensed under MIT, and GIMP has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between rembg and GIMP?

rembg is written in Python and GIMP in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, rembg or GIMP?

Choose rembg if you want the larger community (24,813 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose GIMP if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.