head to head · open source

rembg vs FerrumPix

rembg has 24,813 GitHub stars, 2,422 forks, 3 open issues and last shipped 12 days ago. FerrumPix has 652 stars, 16 forks, 3 open issues and last shipped yesterday. rembg leads on adoption by 3,706% (24,813 vs 652 stars). rembg is written in Python under MIT; FerrumPix is written in Visual Basic .NET under GPL-3.0. rembg has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, FerrumPix 2%. FerrumPix was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

rembg ★ 25K FerrumPix ★ 652 category Miscellaneous

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

rembg FerrumPix
GitHub stars ★ 25K ★ 652
License MIT GPL-3.0
Written in Python Visual Basic .NET
Last push 2026-09-08 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 2.4K ⑂ 16
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick rembg if

  • You weight community size — 25K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full rembg profile →

pick FerrumPix if

  • You want the FerrumPix feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Visual Basic .NET
  • You evaluated both and FerrumPix fits your workflow better

full FerrumPix profile →

About rembg

Rembg is an MIT licensed Python tool for removing image backgrounds, usable as a CLI, a Python library, an HTTP server, or a Docker container, and aimed at developers, designers, and automated image pipelines that need background removal without depending on a hosted service.

read the full rembg overview →

About FerrumPix

FerrumPix is a free, GPL 3.0 desktop photo manager and image editor built with Avalonia UI and .NET 10 in VB.NET for Linux and Windows, with experimental ARM64 and macOS builds, aimed at hobby photographers and enthusiasts who want library management, RAW development and pixel editing in one local application instead of across four separate programs.

read the full FerrumPix overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

opencut vs losslesscut opencut vs audacity opencut vs shotcut opencut vs darktable opencut vs krita opencut vs openshot opencut vs gimp opencut vs kdenlive firecrawl vs godot firecrawl vs gdevelop godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs cratedb opencut vs cratedb

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

rembg vs OpenCut rembg vs LosslessCut rembg vs sharp rembg vs Audacity rembg vs filepond rembg vs Shotcut rembg vs ImageToolbox rembg vs palmier-pro rembg vs Darktable rembg vs libvips rembg vs imgproxy rembg vs Krita

Frequently asked questions

Is rembg or FerrumPix more popular?

rembg has 24,813 GitHub stars and FerrumPix has 652. rembg has the larger community by that measure.

Are rembg and FerrumPix free?

Both are open source. rembg is licensed under MIT and FerrumPix under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between rembg and FerrumPix?

rembg is written in Python and FerrumPix in Visual Basic .NET. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, rembg or FerrumPix?

Choose rembg if you want the larger community (24,813 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose FerrumPix if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.