head to head · open source

OpenShot vs cartcut

OpenShot has 6,546 GitHub stars, 813 forks, 418 open issues and last shipped yesterday. cartcut has 755 stars, 70 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped yesterday. OpenShot leads on adoption by 767% (6,546 vs 755 stars). OpenShot is written in Python under a custom or non-standard licence; cartcut is written in TypeScript under MIT. OpenShot has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, cartcut 9%. cartcut was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (ffmpeg), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

OpenShot ★ 6.5K cartcut ★ 755 category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

OpenShot cartcut
GitHub stars ★ 6.5K ★ 755
License Custom / other MIT
Written in Python TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-24 2026-09-24
Forks ⑂ 813 ⑂ 70
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick OpenShot if

  • You weight community size — 6.5K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full OpenShot profile →

pick cartcut if

  • You want the cartcut feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and cartcut fits your workflow better

full cartcut profile →

About OpenShot

OpenShot Video Editor is a free, cross platform, open source video editor for Linux, Mac, and Windows, built for hobbyists, educators, and small production teams who want timeline based editing and animation without a commercial subscription.

read the full OpenShot overview →

About cartcut

CartCut is an MIT licensed, TypeScript and Electron desktop video editor for AI agents, built on the belief that open source can beat commercial tools, and aimed at creators who want layer based motion graphics editing on their own machine.

read the full cartcut overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 184K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 98K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

opencut vs losslesscut opencut vs sharp opencut vs rembg opencut vs audacity opencut vs filepond opencut vs shotcut opencut vs imagetoolbox opencut vs palmier-pro firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

OpenShot vs OpenCut OpenShot vs LosslessCut OpenShot vs sharp OpenShot vs rembg OpenShot vs Audacity OpenShot vs filepond OpenShot vs Shotcut OpenShot vs ImageToolbox OpenShot vs palmier-pro OpenShot vs Darktable OpenShot vs libvips OpenShot vs imgproxy

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenShot or cartcut more popular?

OpenShot has 6,546 GitHub stars and cartcut has 755. OpenShot has the larger community by that measure.

Are OpenShot and cartcut free?

Both are open source. OpenShot has no licence declared in this registry, and cartcut is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between OpenShot and cartcut?

OpenShot is written in Python and cartcut in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, OpenShot or cartcut?

Choose OpenShot if you want the larger community (6,546 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose cartcut if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.