head to head · open source

openharness vs partmode

openharness has 529 GitHub stars, 50 forks, 40 open issues and last shipped yesterday. partmode has 511 stars, 24 forks, 11 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. openharness leads on adoption by 4% (529 vs 511 stars). openharness is written in C under MIT; partmode is written in JavaScript under AGPL-3.0. openharness has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, partmode 5%. openharness was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (3d-modeling, ai-agents, cad), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

openharness ★ 529 partmode ★ 511 category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

openharness partmode
GitHub stars ★ 529 ★ 511
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Written in C JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-21 2026-08-17
Forks ⑂ 50 ⑂ 24
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick openharness if

  • You weight community size — 529 stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full openharness profile →

pick partmode if

  • You want the partmode feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and partmode fits your workflow better

full partmode profile →

About openharness

OpenHarness is MIT licensed open source software and hardware, written in C, that gives people who build with coding agents one place to run those agents alongside domain tools and live viewers for work beyond software — CAD parts, circuit boards, data analysis, and video.

read the full openharness overview →

About partmode

PartMode is an open source, local first 3D parametric CAD application that runs in the browser for people and for permissioned typed agents, built on OpenCascade WebAssembly, and it is aimed at mechanical designers, engineers, and agent developers who want exact parametric modelling without a desktop CAD installation.

read the full partmode overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 183K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

ant-design vs open-design ant-design vs manim open-design vs manim firecrawl vs openpencil firecrawl vs draw-io firecrawl vs plasmic firecrawl vs quant-ux firecrawl vs grida firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Design & Prototyping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.

openharness vs ant-design openharness vs open-design openharness vs manim openharness vs anime openharness vs hyperframes openharness vs daisyui openharness vs tabler openharness vs motion openharness vs layui openharness vs lottie-ios openharness vs vant openharness vs primitives

Frequently asked questions

Is openharness or partmode more popular?

openharness has 529 GitHub stars and partmode has 511. openharness has the larger community by that measure.

Are openharness and partmode free?

Both are open source. openharness is licensed under MIT and partmode under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between openharness and partmode?

openharness is written in C and partmode in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, openharness or partmode?

Choose openharness if you want the larger community (529 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose partmode if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.