head to head · open source

OpenCut vs postprocessing

OpenCut has 92,358 GitHub stars, 9,094 forks, 378 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. postprocessing has 2,874 stars, 251 forks, 30 open issues and last shipped yesterday. OpenCut leads on adoption by 3,114% (92,358 vs 2,874 stars). OpenCut is written in TypeScript under MIT; postprocessing is written in JavaScript under Zlib. OpenCut has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, postprocessing 9%. postprocessing was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

OpenCut ★ 92K postprocessing ★ 2.9K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

OpenCut postprocessing
GitHub stars ★ 92K ★ 2.9K
License MIT Zlib
Written in TypeScript JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-24 2026-10-04
Forks ⑂ 9.1K ⑂ 251
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick OpenCut if

  • You weight community size — 92K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full OpenCut profile →

pick postprocessing if

  • You want the postprocessing feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Zlib license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and postprocessing fits your workflow better

full postprocessing profile →

About OpenCut

OpenCut is a free, MIT licensed video editor that runs in the browser and is being rebuilt to serve web, desktop, and mobile from a single codebase, aimed at creators who want an open source alternative to CapCut.

read the full OpenCut overview →

About postprocessing

Postprocessing is a JavaScript post processing library for three.js that gives WebGL developers a passes and effects pipeline for applying fullscreen image effects to a rendered scene in real time.

read the full postprocessing overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 189K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 99K manim ★ 95K

Related comparisons

opencut vs losslesscut opencut vs sharp opencut vs rembg opencut vs audacity opencut vs filepond opencut vs shotcut opencut vs imagetoolbox opencut vs palmier-pro home-assistant vs opencut opencut vs fleetbase firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

OpenCut vs LosslessCut OpenCut vs sharp OpenCut vs rembg OpenCut vs Audacity OpenCut vs filepond OpenCut vs Shotcut OpenCut vs ImageToolbox OpenCut vs palmier-pro OpenCut vs Darktable OpenCut vs libvips OpenCut vs imgproxy OpenCut vs Krita

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenCut or postprocessing more popular?

OpenCut has 92,358 GitHub stars and postprocessing has 2,874. OpenCut has the larger community by that measure.

Are OpenCut and postprocessing free?

Both are open source. OpenCut is licensed under MIT and postprocessing under Zlib. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between OpenCut and postprocessing?

OpenCut is written in TypeScript and postprocessing in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, OpenCut or postprocessing?

Choose OpenCut if you want the larger community (92,358 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose postprocessing if its feature set, stack or Zlib licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.