head to head · open source

OpenCut vs OpenImageIO

OpenCut has 93,143 GitHub stars, 9,140 forks, 378 open issues and last shipped 14 days ago. OpenImageIO has 2,378 stars, 707 forks, 143 open issues and last shipped yesterday. OpenCut leads on adoption by 3,817% (93,143 vs 2,378 stars). OpenCut is written in TypeScript under MIT; OpenImageIO is written in C++ under Apache-2.0. OpenCut has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, OpenImageIO 30%. OpenImageIO was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

OpenCut ★ 93K OpenImageIO ★ 2.4K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

OpenCut OpenImageIO
GitHub stars ★ 93K ★ 2.4K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript C++
Last push 2026-09-24 2026-10-07
Forks ⑂ 9.1K ⑂ 707
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick OpenCut if

  • You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full OpenCut profile →

pick OpenImageIO if

  • You want the OpenImageIO feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You evaluated both and OpenImageIO fits your workflow better

full OpenImageIO profile →

About OpenCut

OpenCut is a free, MIT licensed video editor that runs in the browser and is being rebuilt to serve web, desktop, and mobile from a single codebase, aimed at creators who want an open source alternative to CapCut.

read the full OpenCut overview →

About OpenImageIO

OpenImageIO is a C++ toolset and format agnostic image I/O library for reading, writing, and processing images across the file formats used in visual effects and animation, built for VFX studios and the developers of renderers, compositors, viewers, and other production pipeline software.

read the full OpenImageIO overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 190K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K open-design ★ 100K ant-design ★ 100K manim ★ 95K

Related comparisons

opencut vs losslesscut opencut vs sharp opencut vs rembg opencut vs audacity opencut vs filepond opencut vs shotcut opencut vs imagetoolbox opencut vs palmier-pro home-assistant vs opencut opencut vs fleetbase firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

OpenCut vs LosslessCut OpenCut vs sharp OpenCut vs rembg OpenCut vs Audacity OpenCut vs filepond OpenCut vs Shotcut OpenCut vs ImageToolbox OpenCut vs palmier-pro OpenCut vs Darktable OpenCut vs libvips OpenCut vs imgproxy OpenCut vs Krita

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenCut or OpenImageIO more popular?

OpenCut has 93,143 GitHub stars and OpenImageIO has 2,378. OpenCut has the larger community by that measure.

Are OpenCut and OpenImageIO free?

Both are open source. OpenCut is licensed under MIT and OpenImageIO under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between OpenCut and OpenImageIO?

OpenCut is written in TypeScript and OpenImageIO in C++. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, OpenCut or OpenImageIO?

Choose OpenCut if you want the larger community (93,143 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose OpenImageIO if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.