head to head · open source

OpenCut vs Kdenlive

OpenCut has 89,680 GitHub stars, 8,852 forks, 378 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. Kdenlive has 5,701 stars, 513 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped yesterday. OpenCut leads on adoption by 1,473% (89,680 vs 5,701 stars). OpenCut is written in TypeScript under MIT; Kdenlive is written in C++ under GPL-3.0. OpenCut has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, Kdenlive 9%. Kdenlive was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

OpenCut ★ 90K Kdenlive ★ 5.7K category Miscellaneous

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

OpenCut Kdenlive
GitHub stars ★ 90K ★ 5.7K
License MIT GPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript C++
Last push 2026-08-10 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 8.9K ⑂ 513
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick OpenCut if

  • You weight community size — 90K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full OpenCut profile →

pick Kdenlive if

  • You want the Kdenlive feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You evaluated both and Kdenlive fits your workflow better

full Kdenlive profile →

About OpenCut

OpenCut is a free, MIT licensed video editor that runs in the browser and is being rebuilt to serve web, desktop, and mobile from a single codebase, aimed at creators who want an open source alternative to CapCut.

read the full OpenCut overview →

About Kdenlive

Kdenlive is a free and open source video editor written in C++, released under the GPL 3.0 license, and developed as part of the KDE ecosystem. It builds on the MLT framework for its editing and playback engine, uses Qt and KDE Frameworks 6 for its graphical interface, and draws on frei0r for video effects and LADSPA for audio effects. The project lives within KDE's development infrastructure, with its primary repository hosted on KDE Invent and a GitHub mirror maintained for visibility, and it is distributed through the official kdenlive.org website.

read the full Kdenlive overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K Home Assistant ★ 91K OpenBB ★ 73K Jellyfin ★ 57K LosslessCut ★ 44K

Related comparisons

opencut vs losslesscut opencut vs audacity opencut vs shotcut opencut vs darktable opencut vs krita opencut vs openshot opencut vs gimp home-assistant vs opencut opencut vs cratedb opencut vs fleetbase firecrawl vs godot godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs cratedb

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

OpenCut vs LosslessCut OpenCut vs Audacity OpenCut vs Shotcut OpenCut vs Darktable OpenCut vs Krita OpenCut vs OpenShot OpenCut vs GIMP OpenCut vs RawTherapee

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenCut or Kdenlive more popular?

OpenCut has 89,680 GitHub stars and Kdenlive has 5,701. OpenCut has the larger community by that measure.

Are OpenCut and Kdenlive free?

Both are open source. OpenCut is licensed under MIT and Kdenlive under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between OpenCut and Kdenlive?

OpenCut is written in TypeScript and Kdenlive in C++. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, OpenCut or Kdenlive?

Choose OpenCut if you want the larger community (89,680 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Kdenlive if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.