head to head · open source

OpenCut vs images

OpenCut has 92,358 GitHub stars, 9,094 forks, 378 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. images has 2,836 stars, 247 forks, 23 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. OpenCut leads on adoption by 3,157% (92,358 vs 2,836 stars). OpenCut is written in TypeScript under MIT; images is written in C++ under BSD-3-Clause. OpenCut has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, images 9%. images was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

OpenCut ★ 92K images ★ 2.8K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

OpenCut images
GitHub stars ★ 92K ★ 2.8K
License MIT BSD-3-Clause
Written in TypeScript C++
Last push 2026-09-24 2026-10-01
Forks ⑂ 9.1K ⑂ 247
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick OpenCut if

  • You weight community size — 92K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full OpenCut profile →

pick images if

  • You want the images feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the BSD-3-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You evaluated both and images fits your workflow better

full images profile →

About OpenCut

OpenCut is a free, MIT licensed video editor that runs in the browser and is being rebuilt to serve web, desktop, and mobile from a single codebase, aimed at creators who want an open source alternative to CapCut.

read the full OpenCut overview →

About images

wsrv.nl images is a self hostable image processing and caching server for developers who want to resize, convert, and proxy remote images from their own infrastructure instead of depending on a third party image CDN.

read the full images overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 189K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 99K manim ★ 95K

Related comparisons

opencut vs losslesscut opencut vs sharp opencut vs rembg opencut vs audacity opencut vs filepond opencut vs shotcut opencut vs imagetoolbox opencut vs palmier-pro home-assistant vs opencut opencut vs fleetbase firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

OpenCut vs LosslessCut OpenCut vs sharp OpenCut vs rembg OpenCut vs Audacity OpenCut vs filepond OpenCut vs Shotcut OpenCut vs ImageToolbox OpenCut vs palmier-pro OpenCut vs Darktable OpenCut vs libvips OpenCut vs imgproxy OpenCut vs Krita

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenCut or images more popular?

OpenCut has 92,358 GitHub stars and images has 2,836. OpenCut has the larger community by that measure.

Are OpenCut and images free?

Both are open source. OpenCut is licensed under MIT and images under BSD-3-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between OpenCut and images?

OpenCut is written in TypeScript and images in C++. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, OpenCut or images?

Choose OpenCut if you want the larger community (92,358 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose images if its feature set, stack or BSD-3-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.